You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are there any other options out there? I am not sure, but this is a requirement of the paper. With the authors of the software package not being the primary "method" creators, I would like to see the authors include some additional text about how people have been doing this research before this package.
Thank you for your feedback, I have provided more information within the manuscript to address this, as well as #10 , which I believe are slightly related. To summarize here: Research utilizing SVIs has historically been limited to either existing national or regional databases. Researchers that want to incorporate social vulnerability information into their research are therefore limited to these existing databases and their pre-determined variable choices, or developing their own index from scratch. Furthermore, researchers’ understanding of what contributes to vulnerability is variable in both time and space. Therefore, it is necessary to tailor SVIs to the context in which they are being applied. The purpose of this package is to create the pipeline between extensively large datasets and easily customizable SVIs, based on the two leading SVI creation methods. This will allow researchers to experiment and manipulate various indices (e.g., general vulnerability, economic, race/ethnicity, etc.) built on a variety of variables more efficiently and effectively. There is a recently published package in R that is capable of calculating the Rank Method SVI, but to the best of the author’s knowledge there is no open source factor analysis based SVI package.
Are there any other options out there? I am not sure, but this is a requirement of the paper. With the authors of the software package not being the primary "method" creators, I would like to see the authors include some additional text about how people have been doing this research before this package.
openjournals/joss-reviews#7212
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: