Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Substantial scholarly effort #10

Open
bkrayfield opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Substantial scholarly effort #10

bkrayfield opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@bkrayfield
Copy link

bkrayfield commented Nov 5, 2024

This is not meant to be a slight to all of the great work done on this repository, but can the authors explain more about why this is different from just a database?

To elaborate, the package seems to be computing the social vulnerability index always from the Census API. So, why not just create a database where this is already provided for all the data in the Census API? Is there a reason I would expect the data to change? So if I pull the data for New York at a specific time, will it change from user to user?

openjournals/joss-reviews#7212

@bkrayfield
Copy link
Author

To add to this comment, would it make sense to add more options to allow for custom borders, etc?

@mdp0023
Copy link
Owner

mdp0023 commented Nov 10, 2024

Thank you for your feedback, and I have added some material to the paper manuscript to address your comment in the “statement of need” section. To summarize: you are correct, the data for a given location will likely not change whether it is pulled today or one year from now (barring any statistical changes from the US Census Bureau, but that is not common). However, what does change throughout time is our understanding of what variables contribute to vulnerability both spatially and temporally. As a result, it is necessary for researchers to tailor SVIs to the context in which they are being applied. Therefore, the purpose of this package is to create the pipeline between extensively large datasets and easily customizable SVIs, based on the two leading methods to do such. This will allow researchers to experiment and manipulate various indices (e.g., general vulnerability, economic, race/ethnicity, etc.) built on a variety of variables more efficiently and effectively. With regard to your comment about custom borders, this is also a feature of the package. Users can select whatever counties or states they are interested in, and based on this decision, the final SVI will be different, especially when using the factor analysis method which is highly dependent on input data. For example, the vulnerability variables are weighted differently based on their significance for whichever region is being examined.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants