-
After writing a page for a researcher I was later asked to include a link to their personal website. What are your thoughts on this? In my view: Pros:
Cons:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
To me, it's fine to include their personal websites - it would be somehow equivalent to including companies' official website, which we do (see Companies), but perhaps less evergreen. I'm also thinking the following:
Re the cons you listed, which I agree with 100%, maybe we can make a rule of including their personal website if they are really personal, and not a page within an institution. In that case, if the person changes institutions, the personal website would reflect their path. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You are right! I didn't think of it that way.
Yeah, I wouldn't link to their Twitter accounts. I guess Twitter is mainly about spontaneity and what's happening at the moment of posting, (and liking cat memes, haha). It's also pretty easy to abandon an account. Thank you for your PR! I'll review it later today! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd just add a bullet pointed list of links at the bottom of the page, after a horizontal rule. We could almost make this part of the template, and then you just delete those that he or she doesn't have. See also
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
You are right! I didn't think of it that way.
Yeah, I wouldn't link to their Twitter accounts. I guess Twitter is mainly about spontaneity and what's happening at the moment of posting, (and liking cat memes, haha). It's also pretty easy to abandon an account.
Thank you for your PR! I'll review it later today!