Add support for indirect text-decoration resolving #678
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks! It's even shorter now. Does this PR fixes #674 and #410 ?
I don't take stand-alone formatting patches. Otherwise it's fine. |
|
Yes, it fixes both of them! |
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I hope I didn't mess up anything in the algorithm, but at least all the test cases pass and the
indirect.svgone looks correct now as well.Also, I ran
cargo fmtwhich changed two other files a bit, I know you usually don't take formatting PRs but I hope it's okay in this case, otherwise I always need to manually undo the changes when running the command. But if you don't want to, I'll revert that change.