fixing, updating, improving

slides.html

@@ -190,15 +190,15 @@ <h2>Reproducible research</h2>
 <h2>We still need more</h2>
 <p>But, let’s face it, in practice, it is currently still relatively easy to brush over many of these requirements. In addition, the incentives are still inconsequential compared to the (perceived) risks. Maybe we need more threads when not being open.</p>
 </section>
-<section id="what-can-we-do-as-ecr" class="slide level2">
-<h2>What can we do as ECR?</h2>
+<section id="what-can-we-do" class="slide level2">
+<h2>What can we do?</h2>
 </section>
 <section id="build-openness-at-the-core-your-research" class="slide level2">
 <h2>Build openness at the core your research</h2>
 <ul>
 <li>Many aspects of open research, and arguable the most important ones, can’t be implemented as an afterthought.</li>
 <li><a href="http://osc.cam.ac.uk/open-research/open-research-pilot-project">Open Research Pilot Project</a> with the Wellcome Trust and OSC in Cambridge</li>
-<li><em>SpatialMap</em> - <a href="https://github.com/SpatialMap/SpatialMapDev">GitHub repository</a> - <a href="https://lgatto.github.io/spatialmap-proposal/">Grant proposal blog</a></li>
+<li><em>SpatialMap</em>: sharing data - <a href="https://github.com/SpatialMap/SpatialMapDev">GitHub repository</a> - <a href="https://lgatto.github.io/spatialmap-proposal/">Grant proposal blog</a></li>
 </ul>
 </section>
 <section id="promoting-open-research-through-peer-review" class="slide level2">

slides.md

@@ -189,13 +189,13 @@ to brush over many of these requirements. In addition, the incentives
 are still inconsequential compared to the (perceived) risks. Maybe we
 need more threads when not being open.
 
-## What can we do as ECR?
+## What can we do?
 
 ## Build openness at the core your research
 
 * Many aspects of open research, and arguable the most important ones, can't be implemented as an afterthought.
 * [Open Research Pilot Project](http://osc.cam.ac.uk/open-research/open-research-pilot-project) with the Wellcome Trust and OSC in Cambridge
-* *SpatialMap* - [GitHub repository](https://github.com/SpatialMap/SpatialMapDev) - [Grant proposal blog](https://lgatto.github.io/spatialmap-proposal/)
+* *SpatialMap*: sharing data - [GitHub repository](https://github.com/SpatialMap/SpatialMapDev) - [Grant proposal blog](https://lgatto.github.io/spatialmap-proposal/)
 
 
 ## Promoting open research through peer review

slides2.html

@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ <h2>Incentives</h2>
 <h2>We still need more</h2>
 <p>But, let’s face it, in practice, it is currently still relatively easy to brush over many of these requirements. In addition, the incentives are still inconsequential compared to the (perceived) risks. Maybe we need more threads when not being open.</p>
 </section>
-<section id="what-can-we-do-as-ecr" class="slide level2">
-<h2>What can we do as ECR?</h2>
+<section id="what-can-we-do" class="slide level2">
+<h2>What can we do?</h2>
 <ul>
 <li>Build openness at the core your research</li>
 <li>Promoting open research through peer review: not data, no review</li>

slides2.md

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ to brush over many of these requirements. In addition, the incentives
 are still inconsequential compared to the (perceived) risks. Maybe we
 need more threads when not being open.
 
-## What can we do as ECR?
+## What can we do?
 
 * Build openness at the core your research
 * Promoting open research through peer review: not data, no review