-
Hello, I've downloaded and built Version AJM 93u+m/1.1.0-alpha 2024-12-30 Thanks a lot for your help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
I gave my stash of compiled historical commits a whirl. Your reproducer starts working as of commit 5c02cd4 (dev branch) a.k.a. c365189 (1.0 branch). So, looks like I fixed this myself on 2024-01-17. I had a slightly different problem in mind then, but I'm not surprised that commit fixed this case as well, as it implements correct lexical analysis of variable names that include array subscripts. In terms of released versions, this is fixed as of ksh 93u+m/1.0.9 and later. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I gave my stash of compiled historical commits a whirl. Your reproducer starts working as of commit 5c02cd4 (dev branch) a.k.a. c365189 (1.0 branch). So, looks like I fixed this myself on 2024-01-17. I had a slightly different problem in mind then, but I'm not surprised that commit fixed this case as well, as it implements correct lexical analysis of variable names that include array subscripts.
In terms of released versions, this is fixed as of ksh 93u+m/1.0.9 and later.