Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(api): [KDL6-295] rename project roles #1159

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

igzjaviergil
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

The same role names are used for KDL and for projects, but roles are different in each case and can be confusing.

Rename project roles to a different name:
ADMIN → OWNER
MANAGER → DEVELOPER
VIEWER → MEMBER

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • I have created tests for my code changes, and the tests are passing.
  • I have executed the pre-commit hooks locally.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/konstellation-io/kdl-server/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • My change requires a change to the documentation (create a new issue if the documentation has not been updated).

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Closes #

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@igzjaviergil igzjaviergil merged commit c658a92 into main Feb 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@igzjaviergil igzjaviergil deleted the feat/KDL6-295-rename-project-roles branch February 11, 2025 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants