Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add proper reference to 'Weighted quantile estimators' #209

Conversation

AndreyAkinshin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #209 (02bcd24) into master (740667e) will not change coverage.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #209   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          126       126           
  Lines         9059      9059           
=========================================
  Hits          9059      9059           

@kingaa
Copy link
Owner

kingaa commented Apr 1, 2024

Looks good. Thanks for this!

@kingaa kingaa closed this Apr 1, 2024
@kingaa kingaa reopened this Apr 1, 2024
@kingaa kingaa closed this Apr 1, 2024
@kingaa
Copy link
Owner

kingaa commented Apr 1, 2024

By the way @AndreyAkinshin : if you have time, please take a look at my implementation of your algorithm. In particular, there is a bit of complexity around the edge cases (q=0, q=1) that shows up here for which I'd appreciate your opinion and/or suggestions.

@kingaa kingaa reopened this Apr 1, 2024
@kingaa kingaa closed this Apr 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants