Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub action timeouts #324

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hmlanigan
Copy link
Member

The canary and new candidate workflows should have been updated as part of #309, to increase the timeout for the tests.

Attempting to fix the new candidate workflow from failing with Custom provider set without credentials:, though I'm not sure of the cause.

Integration workflow already updated, new tests added for multiple
integrations make the tests take longer.
"Error: Custom provider set without credentials:"
but I'm not sure why, the only difference with other actions,
is this one line.
@hmlanigan hmlanigan requested a review from cderici October 18, 2023 15:41
Copy link

@cderici cderici left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM % a small nit.

@@ -70,5 +70,5 @@ jobs:
- env:
TF_ACC: "1"
TEST_CLOUD: ${{ matrix.cloud }}
run: go test -v -cover ./internal/provider/
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why's this different than the workflow timeout?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The other sections can take longer I'd say. They are also timeouts covering different sets of work.

@hmlanigan hmlanigan merged commit 52d9cd1 into juju:main Oct 18, 2023
16 checks passed
@hmlanigan hmlanigan deleted the github-action-timeouts branch October 18, 2023 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants