Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maintenance Status #127

Closed
ibraheemdev opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #128
Closed

Maintenance Status #127

ibraheemdev opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #128
Labels
discussion Looking for input / ideas on this issue

Comments

@ibraheemdev
Copy link
Collaborator

flurry has been a very interesting concurrent hash table experiment and has driven a lot of innovation in that space. However, at this point, flurry suffers from performance as well as memory usage issues under load. These are likely artifacts of the underlying implementation being geared for a garbage collected language and difficult to solve without a design overhaul. dashmap and papaya provide better performance and memory usage across the board. flurry is still a very popular crate, does it make sense to bring attention to some of these issues in the README?

@ibraheemdev ibraheemdev added the discussion Looking for input / ideas on this issue label Oct 9, 2024
@jonhoo
Copy link
Owner

jonhoo commented Oct 20, 2024

Yes, I think it does! I don't feel strongly that flurry must be an "equal competitor" in the space, so would happily take a PR that adds a "better alternatives" section to the readme and crate docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Looking for input / ideas on this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants