Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(rust/rbac-registration): Record CIP509 validation data #95

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

fix(rust/rbac-registration): Record CIP509 validation data #95

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

bkioshn
Copy link
Contributor

@bkioshn bkioshn commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

  • Create a struct that hold the validation result of CIP509, also include any additional data computed from the validation (currently contains precomputed auxiliary)

@bkioshn
fix: validation data
634d41a 
Signed-off-by: bkioshn <bkioshn@gmail.com>
@bkioshn
chore: update version
1d13889 
Signed-off-by: bkioshn <bkioshn@gmail.com>
@bkioshn bkioshn self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@bkioshn bkioshn added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 4, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2024

✅ Test Report | ${\color{lightgreen}Pass: 253/253}$ | ${\color{red}Fail: 0/253}$ |

stevenj
stevenj approved these changes Dec 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevenj stevenj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stevenj stevenj merged commit 47b5514 into main Dec 4, 2024
24 checks passed
@stevenj stevenj deleted the fix/rbac-validation-data branch December 4, 2024 06:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stevenj stevenj stevenj approved these changes

Assignees

@bkioshn bkioshn

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bkioshn @stevenj