-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LW-9927 Update protocol parameters for conway era #1327
LW-9927 Update protocol parameters for conway era #1327
Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent job @mirceahasegan ! 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just left a few nitpicks, but LGTM 🥇 great work! @mirceahasegan
…term_length Origin of rename IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger#3739
…ion_validity_period
That is the db-sync field name. CDDL calls it "inactive".
…g thresholds Query and map pvt_* and dvt_* db-sync param_proposal fields to poolVotingThresholds and drepVotingThresholds respectively. BREAKING CHANGE: removed pool_voting_thresholds and drep_voting_thresholds from ProtocolParamsModel
69c9f25
to
88493d4
Compare
Context
Since the protocol_param_update was changed during Conway era, we need to review how protocol parameters update are handled.
Proposed Solution