You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During WGRDBES-EST 2024 it was noticed that it would be better to have the outputs of RDBESvisualise not in scientific notation.
Usually one uses the command options(scipen=i), with i being a large integer (e.g. 1k), to avoid scientific notation. However, by modifying the user global options, this method may conflict with the requirements of packages repositories like CRAN.
Therefore, how to avoid scientific notation while meeting guidelines is an issue we need to solve.
May a potential solution be to add a dichotomous parameter (sciNotation?) so that is the user to select the notation? Tbd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
During WGRDBES-EST 2024 it was noticed that it would be better to have the outputs of RDBESvisualise not in scientific notation.
Usually one uses the command
options(scipen=i)
, with i being a large integer (e.g. 1k), to avoid scientific notation. However, by modifying the user global options, this method may conflict with the requirements of packages repositories like CRAN.Therefore, how to avoid scientific notation while meeting guidelines is an issue we need to solve.
May a potential solution be to add a dichotomous parameter (
sciNotation
?) so that is the user to select the notation? TbdThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: