Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFLink: move binary sensor into main docs #35153

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

c0ffeeca7
Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 commented Oct 9, 2024

Proposed change

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced documentation for RFLink integration, including detailed configuration for binary sensors, switches, and lights.
    • Added new configuration options for managing multiple devices and attributes in binary sensors.
  • Documentation

    • Improved navigation and organization of integration documentation.
    • Comprehensive URL redirects for better access to community resources and documentation pages.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated links and ensured redirection to current resources.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added current This PR goes into the current branch Hacktoberfest An PR on this issue (or the PR itself) is eligible towards Hacktoberfest! labels Oct 9, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b860880
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/670699088018fb00085e5630
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-35153--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes encompass significant enhancements to the documentation for the RFLink integration in Home Assistant, consolidating information about binary sensors, switches, and lights into a unified section. Additionally, a comprehensive set of URL redirects has been implemented to improve navigation within the documentation, including external resources and restructured integration pages. This includes updates to naming conventions and the removal of outdated links, ensuring users are directed to relevant and current information.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
source/_integrations/binary_sensor.rflink.markdown, source/_integrations/rflink.markdown Consolidated documentation for RFLink integration, added sections for binary sensors, configuration examples, and improved structure. Deleted binary_sensor.rflink.markdown.
source/_redirects Added numerous URL redirects for external resources and restructured integration documentation, including renamed integrations and removal of outdated links.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant RFLink
    participant HomeAssistant

    User->>HomeAssistant: Request RFLink integration info
    HomeAssistant->>RFLink: Fetch RFLink integration documentation
    RFLink-->>HomeAssistant: Return consolidated documentation
    HomeAssistant-->>User: Display RFLink integration info
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
source/_integrations/rflink.markdown (3)

221-225: Minor grammatical improvement needed

The content provides valuable information about how RFLink handles binary sensors. However, there's a small grammatical issue that can be improved.

Consider adding a comma after "Therefore" in the following sentence:

-The RFLink integration does not know the difference between a `binary_sensor`, a `switch` and a `light`. Therefore all switchable devices are automatically added as `light` by default.
+The RFLink integration does not know the difference between a `binary_sensor`, a `switch` and a `light`. Therefore, all switchable devices are automatically added as `light` by default.

This change improves readability and adheres to proper comma usage after introductory words.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~224-~224: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Therefore’.
Context: ...nary_sensor, a switchand alight`. Therefore all switchable devices are automaticall...

(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)


226-229: Correct apostrophe usage

The explanation of RFLink ID composition is clear and helpful. However, there's a minor issue with apostrophe usage that should be corrected.

Change "ID's" to "IDs" in the following sentence:

-RFLink binary_sensor/switch/light ID's are composed of: protocol, id, switch/channel. For example: `newkaku_0000c6c2_1`.
+RFLink binary_sensor/switch/light IDs are composed of: protocol, id, switch/channel. For example: `newkaku_0000c6c2_1`.

This correction ensures proper plural form usage without an apostrophe.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~226-~226: Did you mean the plural noun “IDs”, “ids” instead of the possessive?
Context: ...ult. RFLink binary_sensor/switch/light ID's are composed of: protocol, id, switch/c...

(APOS_ARE)


274-300: Enhance clarity and LGTM for additional information

The additional information about sensor state and device support, along with the example of multiple sensors configuration, is valuable and well-presented. However, a small improvement can enhance clarity.

Consider adding a colon after "Multiple sensors with custom name and device class and set off_delay" to clearly indicate that it's a heading for the following example:

-Multiple sensors with custom name and device class and set off_delay
+Multiple sensors with custom name and device class and set off_delay:

Overall, this section provides excellent additional context and a practical example that will be very helpful for users configuring multiple RFLink binary sensors.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b36b1f0 and ba7b68d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • source/_integrations/binary_sensor.rflink.markdown (0 hunks)
  • source/_integrations/rflink.markdown (1 hunks)
  • source/_redirects (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • source/_integrations/binary_sensor.rflink.markdown
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
source/_redirects (6)

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

  • Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
  • In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
  • In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
  • In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
  • do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

  • If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"


Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.


Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): do not comment on HTML used for icons


Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/rflink.markdown

[uncategorized] ~224-~224: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Therefore’.
Context: ...nary_sensor, a switchand alight`. Therefore all switchable devices are automaticall...

(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~226-~226: Did you mean the plural noun “IDs”, “ids” instead of the possessive?
Context: ...ult. RFLink binary_sensor/switch/light ID's are composed of: protocol, id, switch/c...

(APOS_ARE)


[uncategorized] ~252-~252: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ... name: description: Name for the device. required: false ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_FOR_OF)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
source/_integrations/rflink.markdown (2)

230-239: LGTM: Clear configuration example

The YAML configuration example for binary sensors is well-structured and easy to understand. It provides users with a clear illustration of how to configure a binary sensor in their configuration.yaml file.


240-273: LGTM: Comprehensive configuration documentation

The configuration options for binary sensors are thoroughly documented using the configuration block. Each option is clearly explained with its description, requirement status, type, and default value where applicable. This level of detail is extremely helpful for users setting up their RFLink binary sensors.

The documentation structure and content in this section are excellent, providing users with all the necessary information to configure their devices properly.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~252-~252: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ... name: description: Name for the device. required: false ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_FOR_OF)

source/_redirects (1)

162-162: Correctly added redirect for RFLink binary sensor

The added redirect from /integrations/binary_sensor.rflink to /integrations/rflink/#binary-sensor is appropriate. It ensures users accessing the old URL are directed to the updated documentation section in the main RFLink integration page.

source/_integrations/rflink.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/_integrations/rflink.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/_integrations/rflink.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@frenck frenck merged commit 3586da8 into current Oct 9, 2024
9 checks passed
@frenck frenck deleted the rflink-binary-sensor-merge branch October 9, 2024 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch Hacktoberfest An PR on this issue (or the PR itself) is eligible towards Hacktoberfest!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants