Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use note block in Systemmonitor #35125

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Use note block in Systemmonitor #35125

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

gjohansson-ST
Copy link
Member

@gjohansson-ST gjohansson-ST commented Oct 7, 2024

Proposed change

Use a note block in systemmmonitor.
Also clarifies that all sensors are diagnostics and therefore not automatically added to any automatic dashboard.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added clarifications regarding default settings for integration entities.
    • Specified that sensors are diagnostic and not included in automatic dashboards.
    • Updated disk usage section to clarify limitations on monitoring directory sizes.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added current This PR goes into the current branch Hacktoberfest An PR on this issue (or the PR itself) is eligible towards Hacktoberfest! labels Oct 7, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 45ff4bc
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/67042cb5632858000864c500
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-35125--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 7, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes made to the systemmonitor.markdown file involve the addition of clarifying notes regarding the behavior of integration entities. These notes inform users that all entities are disabled by default and require manual enabling. It also specifies that sensors are classified as diagnostic and will not appear in automatic dashboards. Furthermore, a note in the disk usage section clarifies that monitoring is limited to disks or mount points on Linux, excluding folder or directory sizes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
source/_integrations/systemmonitor.markdown Added notes regarding default entity states, sensor classifications, and disk usage monitoring limitations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SystemMonitor

    User->>SystemMonitor: Enable entities
    SystemMonitor-->>User: Entities enabled

    User->>SystemMonitor: Request sensor data
    SystemMonitor-->>User: Provide diagnostic sensor data

    User->>SystemMonitor: Check disk usage
    SystemMonitor-->>User: Provide disk usage for disks/mount points
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
source/_integrations/systemmonitor.markdown (2)

26-32: Excellent addition of clarifying note!

This note provides crucial information for users about entity behavior. It's well-placed and clearly written.

Consider adding a brief explanation of what "diagnostic" means in this context, as some users might not be familiar with the term.


72-76: Good clarification on disk usage limitations!

This note effectively explains the limitations of disk usage sensors. To enhance clarity, consider rephrasing slightly:

-The disk usage sensors do not support monitoring folder/directory sizes. Instead, it is only concerned with "disks" (more specifically mount points on Linux).
+The disk usage sensors monitor mount points on Linux systems and do not support monitoring individual folder or directory sizes.

This rephrasing puts the focus on what the sensors do, rather than what they don't do, and removes the potentially confusing quotation marks around "disks".

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff82acc and 45ff4bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/systemmonitor.markdown (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/systemmonitor.markdown (2)

Line range hint 1-100: Document structure maintained, minor formatting changes unclear

The overall structure of the document has been well-maintained with the addition of the new notes. However, the diff doesn't show any specific formatting changes.

Could you clarify if any intentional formatting changes were made beyond the addition of the notes? If so, please provide details so we can review them properly.


Line range hint 1-100: Overall, excellent improvements to the documentation!

The added notes provide valuable clarification for users about entity behavior and disk usage limitations. These additions will help prevent misunderstandings and improve the user experience.

The suggestions provided are minor and aimed at further enhancing clarity. Please consider implementing them if you agree they improve the documentation.

Great job on these updates!

Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gjohansson-ST 🙏

../Frenck

@frenck frenck merged commit 90043d5 into current Oct 8, 2024
9 checks passed
@frenck frenck deleted the systemmonitor-note-block branch October 8, 2024 05:00
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch Hacktoberfest An PR on this issue (or the PR itself) is eligible towards Hacktoberfest!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants