Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why not use a 386 alpine with high version #883

Open
introspection3 opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

why not use a 386 alpine with high version #883

introspection3 opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@introspection3
Copy link

why not use a 386 alpine with high version

@holzschu
Copy link
Owner

I might need you to give more explanations here. I assume you mean "as a replacement for WebAssembly interpretation that is used for some commands". But then I don't understand what "with high version" means in that context.
The short answer is that making a 386 alpine interpreter is a lot of work.
We do have a x86 interpreter in recent versions (blink) but an interpreter itself is only the first half, you need to port the entire system as well, and integrating with iOS system functions is very complicated.

@introspection3
Copy link
Author

Sir, I think you can develop a special browser to force Apple (browsers are protected by antitrust laws) to open the JIT function to you. This browser can run the virtual machine function.
at same time ,you can use webassembly sockets function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants