You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Going through the standard definitions in the default_en.txt file, would it be allowed (possible) to define best practice definitions for accelerations, jerks, etc. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_derived_unit)
meter_per_second_squared
meter_per_second_cubed
...
for the unit registry. Same for radians and there could be way more :-). I was wondering, as a standard definition typically ensures upstream testing and support if they can be added. I could prepare PR's.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, you can do this. That is a near endless task though.
Another option is to try to integrate a units ontology into pint that already has this information. Maybe after the planned shift to a .toml units file.
Going through the standard definitions in the default_en.txt file, would it be allowed (possible) to define best practice definitions for accelerations, jerks, etc. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_derived_unit)
for the unit registry. Same for radians and there could be way more :-). I was wondering, as a standard definition typically ensures upstream testing and support if they can be added. I could prepare PR's.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: