Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WFS: WFS Service in EPSG:4326, but bbox using local coordinate system is used #1591

Open
eri-blan opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@eri-blan
Copy link

Describe the bug
I noticed that for us, when a WFS layer is setup using EPSG:4326 (had to be since it is the only coordinate system available for the service) or perhaps any other than the coordinate system of the map (?), requests to the WFS service (GetFeature) uses for instance in our case EPSG:3009 coordinates for the bbox parameter, resulting in an error.

Using latest develop.

@jacobwod
Copy link
Member

Could you please do a quick test with this setup and see if it only occurs when the WFS service's layer is in 4326? This should happen for other projections as well, as soon as they differ from your map's projection. What happens if you use a WFS set in 3006 in your 3009 map?

@eri-blan
Copy link
Author

eri-blan commented Feb 12, 2025

Could you please do a quick test with this setup and see if it only occurs when the WFS service's layer is in 4326? This should happen for other projections as well, as soon as they differ from your map's projection. What happens if you use a WFS set in 3006 in your 3009 map?

Seems to work when i test this but i suspect it has to do with the fact that the service i´m testing has both 3006 and 3009 available as possible projections. The service that only has EPSG:4326 available I suppose can´t handle a bounding box in for example 3009. The request bbox parameter specifies which projection the bbox is given for like bbox=x,y,EPSG:3009

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants