Actions: github/codeql-coding-standards
Actions
251 workflow runs
251 workflow runs
github/codeql
dependency to 2.19.4
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2054:
Issue comment #850 (comment)
created
by
codeql-coding-standards-automation
bot
github/codeql
dependency to 2.19.4
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2053:
Issue comment #850 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
CON34-C
: Implementation seems to check incorrect aspects of thread storage duration objects
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2048:
Issue comment #801 (comment)
created
by
MichaelRFairhurst
const
in AUTOSAR rule 7-1-1.
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2044:
Issue comment #814 (comment)
created
by
fjatWbyT
const
in AUTOSAR rule 7-1-1.
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2043:
Issue comment #814 (comment)
created
by
fjatWbyT
A7-1-2
: Alert on move constructor declaration that cannot be constexpr
specified
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2042:
Issue comment #529 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
const
in AUTOSAR rule 7-1-1.
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2041:
Issue comment #814 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A7-1-2
: Certain logging functions are reported because they are considered side-effect free
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2040:
Issue comment #227 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M5-0-12
: Incorrect alerts on assignments of valid numerical values
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2039:
Issue comment #541 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A15-4-2
: Ignore elided calls when calculating the exception graph
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2038:
Issue comment #158 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A1-1-1
: Implementation of Rule only looks for deprecated features and not use of implementation extensions
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2037:
Issue comment #86 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A12-1-1
: Does not apply transitively
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2036:
Issue comment #829 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M7-5-1
: Class members are considered as **automatic** variables
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2031:
Issue comment #805 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A2-10-5
: id name reuse false positive with template specialization
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#2030:
Issue comment #806 (comment)
created
by
lcartey