Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REFERENCIAS CAPITULO X (103 A 107) #21

Open
ggmarmolalioto opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

REFERENCIAS CAPITULO X (103 A 107) #21

ggmarmolalioto opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Referencias Notas incluidas

Comments

@ggmarmolalioto
Copy link
Owner

REFERENCIAS CAPITULO X (103 A 107)

NOTA 103. Véase en http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1118.Opinion.3-26-2018.1.PDF

NOTA 104. En su versión original en inglés: “Section 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors”.

NOTA 105. Ver en https://www.copyright.gov/title17/title17.pdf

NOTA 106. Véase el caso Mattel Inc. V. Walking Mountain Prods., 353 F.3d 792, 800 (9th Cir. 2003)

NOTA 107. Se afirma que este criterio se encuentra basado en la decisión de la Corte Suprema de los EE.UU., que en el caso Harper & Row, SCOTUS dijo que el uso justo presupone “good faith” and “fair dealing”.

@ggmarmolalioto ggmarmolalioto added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Referencias Notas incluidas labels Feb 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Referencias Notas incluidas
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant