Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set platform release branch #2500

Closed

Conversation

singlecoder
Copy link
Member

@singlecoder singlecoder commented Jan 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use a specific version of the platform adapter action instead of the main branch.

@singlecoder singlecoder self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/release.yml by updating the version tag for the galacean/platform-adapter action from @main to @0.0. This change pins the workflow to use a specific version of the platform adapter action instead of always using the latest main branch version, which could potentially impact the release process and action behavior.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release.yml Updated action version from galacean/platform-adapter@main to galacean/platform-adapter@0.0

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: update release action #2474: Another PR involving modifications to the release workflow file, specifically related to bundling the polyfill and engine using the galacean/platform-adapter action.

Suggested reviewers

  • GuoLei1990

Poem

🐰 A workflow's version, now precise and neat
From main to zero-point-zero, a rabbit's feat
Pinned down with care, no more wild and free
A specific path for our release to be!
Hop hop hooray for workflow delight! 🚀

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8414f9 and e042b03.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: e2e (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: codecov
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

Line range hint 110-134: Test this version change in a staging environment first.

This is a critical change in the release workflow that affects the bundling of multiple components. Before merging:

  1. Test the workflow with this version in a staging environment
  2. Verify that all components are bundled correctly
  3. Validate the output bundle structure and contents
  4. Ensure compatibility with the CDN sync process

Run this script to compare the bundle output between versions:

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ jobs:
cat ${{ github.workspace }}/platform-adapter/package.json

- name: Bundle polyfill and engine
uses: galacean/platform-adapter@main
uses: galacean/platform-adapter@0.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use specific alpha version instead of partial version specifier

The repository only has alpha releases (v0.0.0-alpha.1 through v0.0.0-alpha.9). Using @0.0 with pre-release software could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider using the latest specific version: @v0.0.0-alpha.9

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the platform adapter version choice.

While pinning the version is a good practice for stability and reproducibility, @0.0 seems unusual. This version number might indicate a pre-release version or could be incorrect.

Let's verify the available versions:

Consider using:

  • A specific release version (e.g., @1.0.0) for stability
  • A specific commit SHA for immutability
  • A major version tag (e.g., @v1) for managed updates within major versions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check available versions of the platform-adapter action

# Check the repository's releases and tags
gh api repos/galacean/platform-adapter/releases --jq '.[].tag_name'
gh api repos/galacean/platform-adapter/tags --jq '.[].name'

Length of output: 296

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.49%. Comparing base (a8414f9) to head (e042b03).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           dev/1.4    #2500      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    68.50%   68.49%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          956      956              
  Lines       100007   100007              
  Branches      8545     8545              
===========================================
- Hits         68506    68497       -9     
- Misses       31245    31254       +9     
  Partials       256      256              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 68.49% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@GuoLei1990 GuoLei1990 closed this Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants