From 0d99c7cf7bd01a7b80d82a4fc34b2181cb3b33c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Susheel Varma Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:38:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Corrects link to GA4GH . checksum hash algorithm registry (#106) * Correcting hash algorithm registry link * Correcting hash alg registry link * Fixing unrelated link --- openapi/ga4gh-tool-discovery.yaml | 2 +- openapi/openapi.yaml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/openapi/ga4gh-tool-discovery.yaml b/openapi/ga4gh-tool-discovery.yaml index b48f9d06..d67c371a 100644 --- a/openapi/ga4gh-tool-discovery.yaml +++ b/openapi/ga4gh-tool-discovery.yaml @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ definitions: type: string description: |- The digest method used to create the checksum. - The value (e.g. `sha-256`) SHOULD be listed as `Hash Name String` in the https://github.com/ga4gh-discovery/ga4gh-hash-alg-registry/blob/master/hash-alg.csv[GA4GH Hash Algorithm Registry]. + The value (e.g. `sha-256`) SHOULD be listed as `Hash Name String` in the https://github.com/ga4gh-discovery/ga4gh-checksum/blob/master/hash-alg.csv[GA4GH Checksum Hash Algorithm Registry]. Other values MAY be used, as long as implementors are aware of the issues discussed in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920#section-9.4[RFC6920]. GA4GH may provide more explicit guidance for use of non-IANA-registered algorithms in the future. ToolFile: diff --git a/openapi/openapi.yaml b/openapi/openapi.yaml index 610d284d..0fb44f61 100644 --- a/openapi/openapi.yaml +++ b/openapi/openapi.yaml @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ components: description: >- The digest method used to create the checksum. - The value (e.g. `sha-256`) SHOULD be listed as `Hash Name String` in the https://github.com/ga4gh-discovery/ga4gh-hash-alg-registry/blob/master/hash-alg.csv[GA4GH Hash Algorithm Registry]. + The value (e.g. `sha-256`) SHOULD be listed as `Hash Name String` in the https://github.com/ga4gh-discovery/ga4gh-checksum/blob/master/hash-alg.csv[GA4GH Checksum Hash Algorithm Registry]. Other values MAY be used, as long as implementors are aware of the issues discussed in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920#section-9.4[RFC6920].