Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for nodeSelector on deployments #72

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

cococowboy
Copy link
Contributor

Public-Facing Changes

Adding support for nodeSelector(s) on deployments

Description

We are currently running two clusters, x86 and ARM64. We want to migrate to a single cluster (currently only ARM64) with an additional NodePool for x86 services, of which Foxglove is the primary. In order to target Foxglove to those nodes (and not the ARM64), we need to be able to set nodeSelectors on the deployments.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Feb 13, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

metrics:
namespace: ""
subsystem: ""
env: []
env:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's this change about? Your code editor decided to move the []?

Copy link
Contributor

@wimagguc wimagguc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable to me; will let @foxglovenes to take the helm and approve.

Copy link
Contributor

@foxglovenes foxglovenes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I'll push a commit that reverts the style change Roman pointed out and bumps the versions.

@foxglovenes foxglovenes merged commit 837b107 into foxglove:main Feb 14, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants