LoTW Upload Station Profiles

[aa5sh]

Since adding the County to the Station Profile I have experienced tQSL errors due to county not matching my location in tQSL. So I added logic to allow the user to select the station profile. Since the station profile name isn't stored in the contact, I linked on the fields taht seemed to matter to tQSL.

[foldynl]

Yes, you are right. It seems that TQSL has the ability to define fields for QTH (see URL). Unfortunately, I am from a DXCC that does not have these fields, so TQSL does not show me anything like that, and therefore I cannot test it. However, the question is whether, in this case, it makes sense to keep the Callsign and Grid there, when having just the profile might be sufficient. What do you think?

[aa5sh]

It would make sense just to pull it from the Station Profile. Only downside is if operators don’t have good names for their Station Profile to know. I have started to put my callsign because my son - who is a ham - has been on a couple POTA activations with me and it was easier just to use my laptop. 

…

On Dec 16, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Ladislav ***@***.***> wrote: Yes, you are right. It seems that TQSL has the ability to define fields for QTH (see URL <https://lotw.arrl.org/lotw-help/stnloc/?lang=en>). Unfortunately, I am from a DXCC that does not have these fields, so TQSL does not show me anything like that, and therefore I cannot test it. However, the question is whether, in this case, it makes sense to keep the Callsign and Grid there, when having just the profile might be sufficient. What do you think? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#551 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUEEMXVES3NUBVTNNPERZND2F2UTFAVCNFSM6AAAAABTUEH3POVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNBVGIYTOOJQGA>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.