Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
|
This most likely looks like a modded pyinstaller executable. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Would much appreciate it if you would look at it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My email is mentioned on my GitHub profile. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Emailed it to the address in your profile. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Replied to your mail. Its extracting fine. Not modded in any way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Than you again for all of you efforts :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I only took a quick look at the files and from that this doesn't look malicious, atleast on the surface. Yes much of the files are from standard Python files/libraries - judging from the names. However there's no way to fully guarantee that as malicious behaviour can always be hidden deep underneath. If the origin of the file is not something to worry about then I guess this is also benign. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi again,
Wondering if you would be interested and what you would charge me to go through the program and just confirm that it only does what it says it does and that there is nothing more hidden in it.
I doubt that this guy is a government level master hacker so I would just need you do do this at medium level and confirm it is all on the up and up.
Thanks again for for time & effort.
Jack
…________________________________
From: extremecoders-re ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 4:56 AM
To: extremecoders-re/pyinstxtractor ***@***.***>
Cc: JP-NYC ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [extremecoders-re/pyinstxtractor] struct.error: unpack requires a buffer of 6906162 bytes (Discussion #50)
I only took a quick look at the files and from that this doesn't look malicious, atleast on the surface. Yes much of the files are from standard Python files/libraries - judging from the names. However there's no way to fully guarantee that as malicious behaviour can always be hidden deep underneath. If the origin of the file is not something to worry about then I guess this is also benign.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#50 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALTHMYT7PIBTSXBHMUBBOF3VPBCNBANCNFSM5YN2IZNA>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi, manually going through program to ascertain its not malicious is quite time taking. You can always use online scanners like virustotal for a quick insight. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm (a newbie) trying to look at the contents of a file that runs on a Mac in Terminal. I think is written in python because when I look at the contents in a hex editor I see some references to py and python in it. I tried to get pyinstxtractor to run on the Mac (only using the native built in python) but couldn't so I installed python on my Windows machine.
When I run pyinstxtractor on it this is my output, not sure how to proceed. I added the pyo extension to the file.
C:\Users\David>D:\pyinstxtractor.py d:\SA.pyo
[+] Processing d:\SA.pyo
[+] Pyinstaller version: 2.0
[+] Python version: 309
[+] Length of package: 9419143 bytes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "D:\pyinstxtractor.py", line 423, in
main()
File "D:\pyinstxtractor.py", line 411, in main
arch.parseTOC()
File "D:\pyinstxtractor.py", line 235, in parseTOC
struct.unpack(
struct.error: unpack requires a buffer of 6906162 bytes
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions