Fix operand order in leaked bytes check in step_4_leak_test_2.rs of doubly-linked-list exercise #2032
Conversation
… check. Update step_4_leak_test_2.rs to fix the order of operands in the leaked bytes check. Previously, this would fail when expected, but by an underflow error from subtracting a larger unsigned number rather than the assertion for the value being zero.
|
Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂 We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch. If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post. Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it. |
Update step_4_leak_test_2.rs to fix the order of operands in the leaked bytes check. Previously, this would fail when expected, but by an underflow error from subtracting a larger unsigned number rather than the assertion for the value being zero.