Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prefer more concise and cross-language ** operator over Integer.pow/2 #1547

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

codingthat
Copy link
Contributor

@codingthat codingthat commented Feb 12, 2025

** has been available since 1.13, and will be already familiar to those coming from other languages.

Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for contributing to exercism/elixir 💜 🎉. This is an automated PR comment 🤖 for the maintainers of this repository that helps with the PR review process. You can safely ignore it and wait for a maintainer to review your changes.

Based on the files changed in this PR, it would be good to pay attention to the following details when reviewing the PR:

  • General steps

    • 🏆 Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier (x:size/{tiny,small,medium,large,massive})? (A medium reputation amount is awarded by default, see docs)
  • Any exercise changed

    • 👤 Does the author of the PR need to be added as an author or contributor in <exercise>/.meta/config.json (see docs)?
    • 🔬 Do the analyzer and the analyzer comments exist for this exercise? Do they need to be changed?
    • 📜 Does the design file (<exercise>/.meta/design.md) need to be updated to document new implementation decisions?
  • Concept exercise changed

    • 🌲 Do prerequisites and practices in config.json need to be updated?
    • 📖 Does the concept introduction provide all necessary information to solve this exercise?

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

@angelikatyborska
Copy link
Member

Sure, why not! We don't support solving Exercism exercises in Elixir 1.12 or lower anyway.

@neenjaw
Copy link
Contributor

neenjaw commented Feb 12, 2025

@codingthat @angelikatyborska I agree 👍

@angelikatyborska angelikatyborska merged commit 9fbfa93 into exercism:main Feb 12, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants