-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix race condition (also a regression of the PR 19139) #19221
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files
... and 23 files with indirect coverage changes @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #19221 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.80% 68.77% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 420 420
Lines 35650 35665 +15
==========================================
- Hits 24529 24528 -1
- Misses 9694 9713 +19
+ Partials 1427 1424 -3 Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
c76bbeb
to
b1e5ebc
Compare
@fuweid @ivanvc @jmhbnz @serathius This PR fixed a regression caused by #19139. So let's get this merged and backport to 3.5 and probably 3.4. We need to get it included in 3.5.18 |
/test pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-arm64 |
…te before it returns Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <benjamin.ahrtr@gmail.com>
… the errc Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <benjamin.ahrtr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <benjamin.ahrtr@gmail.com>
@ahrtr: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Fix #19172
Please review this PR commit by commit.
Three high level thoughts,
sync.WaitGroup
, we should always callwg.Add
andwg.Wait
in the same goroutine.cc @serathius @fuweid @ivanvc @jmhbnz @joshuazh-x