Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added localityCode in individual while creation #1324

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

yashita-egov
Copy link
Collaborator

@yashita-egov yashita-egov commented Jan 6, 2025

HCMPRE-1820: To add localityCode while creating individual while hrms create employee

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced user creation process with locality-specific information
    • Added support for creating users based on their local jurisdiction
  • Improvements

    • Updated user creation workflow to include more precise locality details
    • Expanded service capabilities for more granular user management

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes focus on enhancing the employee user creation process in the HRMS (Human Resource Management System) by introducing locality-based user creation. The EmployeeService now includes an IndividualService to support creating users with specific locality information. This modification allows for more granular user creation by incorporating locality codes from employee jurisdictions when generating user accounts.

Changes

File Change Summary
core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/EmployeeService.java - Added IndividualService dependency
- Modified createUser method to use locality-based user creation
core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/IndividualService.java - Updated mapToIndividualRequest to accept locality code
- Added createUserByLocality method
- Enhanced individual request creation with locality information

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant EmployeeService
    participant IndividualService
    participant UserService
    
    EmployeeService->>EmployeeService: Check user creation method
    alt Locality-based creation
        EmployeeService->>IndividualService: createUserByLocality
        IndividualService-->>EmployeeService: Return UserResponse
    else Default creation
        EmployeeService->>UserService: createUser
        UserService-->>EmployeeService: Return UserResponse
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Locality Logic

In HRMS where users bloom and grow,
Locality whispers where they should go,
With code so smart and service so bright,
We map each user with jurisdictional might!
Hop, hop, hooray for data's new flight! 🌍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@yashita-egov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd342c6 and 0a6877e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/EmployeeService.java (2 hunks)
  • core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/IndividualService.java (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/IndividualService.java (2)

52-52: LGTM!

The change maintains backward compatibility by passing null as the localityCode parameter.


66-79: LGTM!

The new method is well-structured and follows the existing patterns. It extends the user creation functionality to include locality information while maintaining consistency with the existing implementation.

core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/EmployeeService.java (2)

106-108: LGTM!

The field is correctly annotated for dependency injection and follows proper encapsulation principles.


270-278: Verify locality code retrieval logic.

The code assumes that:

  1. The first jurisdiction's boundary represents the locality code.
  2. The boundary code format is compatible with the locality code format.

Please verify these assumptions and consider:

  1. Adding validation for the boundary code format.
  2. Documenting why the first jurisdiction is chosen.

Run the following script to verify the boundary code format:

✅ Verification successful

The locality code retrieval logic is valid and follows established patterns.

The code's assumptions are supported by the codebase:

  1. Using the first jurisdiction's boundary is a standard pattern for setting an employee's primary location.
  2. Boundary code format validation is handled by the location service, which validates all boundary codes against its records.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the format of boundary codes in existing jurisdictions.

# Test: Search for boundary code patterns in jurisdiction declarations.
rg -A 5 'setBoundary|boundary\s*=' 

Length of output: 55384


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for jurisdiction related code and models
echo "=== Searching for jurisdiction models ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class Jurisdiction {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\n=== Searching for jurisdiction documentation ==="
rg -l -g '*.md' -i 'jurisdiction|boundary'

echo -e "\n=== Searching for boundary validation ==="
rg -A 5 'validate.*[Bb]oundary|[Bb]oundary.*validate'

Length of output: 43230

@kavi-egov kavi-egov merged commit 6301026 into HCMPRE-1763 Jan 28, 2025
2 checks passed
@kavi-egov kavi-egov deleted the locality-hrms branch January 28, 2025 09:30
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants