-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added localityCode in individual while creation #1324
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes focus on enhancing the employee user creation process in the HRMS (Human Resource Management System) by introducing locality-based user creation. The Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant EmployeeService
participant IndividualService
participant UserService
EmployeeService->>EmployeeService: Check user creation method
alt Locality-based creation
EmployeeService->>IndividualService: createUserByLocality
IndividualService-->>EmployeeService: Return UserResponse
else Default creation
EmployeeService->>UserService: createUser
UserService-->>EmployeeService: Return UserResponse
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/EmployeeService.java
(2 hunks)core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/IndividualService.java
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/IndividualService.java (2)
52-52
: LGTM!The change maintains backward compatibility by passing
null
as thelocalityCode
parameter.
66-79
: LGTM!The new method is well-structured and follows the existing patterns. It extends the user creation functionality to include locality information while maintaining consistency with the existing implementation.
core-services/egov-hrms/src/main/java/org/egov/hrms/service/EmployeeService.java (2)
106-108
: LGTM!The field is correctly annotated for dependency injection and follows proper encapsulation principles.
270-278
: Verify locality code retrieval logic.The code assumes that:
- The first jurisdiction's boundary represents the locality code.
- The boundary code format is compatible with the locality code format.
Please verify these assumptions and consider:
- Adding validation for the boundary code format.
- Documenting why the first jurisdiction is chosen.
Run the following script to verify the boundary code format:
✅ Verification successful
The locality code retrieval logic is valid and follows established patterns.
The code's assumptions are supported by the codebase:
- Using the first jurisdiction's boundary is a standard pattern for setting an employee's primary location.
- Boundary code format validation is handled by the location service, which validates all boundary codes against its records.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the format of boundary codes in existing jurisdictions. # Test: Search for boundary code patterns in jurisdiction declarations. rg -A 5 'setBoundary|boundary\s*='Length of output: 55384
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for jurisdiction related code and models echo "=== Searching for jurisdiction models ===" ast-grep --pattern 'class Jurisdiction { $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Searching for jurisdiction documentation ===" rg -l -g '*.md' -i 'jurisdiction|boundary' echo -e "\n=== Searching for boundary validation ===" rg -A 5 'validate.*[Bb]oundary|[Bb]oundary.*validate'Length of output: 43230
HCMPRE-1820: To add localityCode while creating individual while hrms create employee
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements