Updated the code for immediate children search #1054
Conversation
himanshukeshari-eGov
requested review from
kavi-egov and
sathishp-eGov
as code owners
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to project management functionality, primarily by adding a new parameter, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)health-services/project/pom.xml (1)🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/service/ProjectService.java (2)
Line range hint
269-270: Consider explicit boolean values instead of null.In
getParentProjectsandcheckAndEnrichCascadingProjectDates, theincludeImmediateChildrenparameter is passed as null. Consider using an explicitfalsefor clarity and consistency.- parentProjects = searchProject(getSearchProjectRequest(projectsForSearchRequest, projectRequest.getRequestInfo(), true), projectConfiguration.getMaxLimit(), projectConfiguration.getDefaultOffset(), projectRequest.getProjects().get(0).getTenantId(), null, false, false, false, null, null); + parentProjects = searchProject(getSearchProjectRequest(projectsForSearchRequest, projectRequest.getRequestInfo(), true), projectConfiguration.getMaxLimit(), projectConfiguration.getDefaultOffset(), projectRequest.getProjects().get(0).getTenantId(), null, false, false, false, false, null, null);- null, + false, null );Also applies to: 310-311
After analyzing the ProjectValidator class, I can generate the final response since I have found that there is no validation for the
includeImmediateChildrenparameter in the validator class. The validator only validates basic search parameters like limit, offset, tenantId, and date-related fields in thevalidateSearchProjectRequestParamsmethod, but does not include any validation for the relationship betweenincludeImmediateChildrenandincludeDescendantsflags.Add validation for includeImmediateChildren parameter
The
validateSearchProjectRequestParamsmethod should be enhanced to include validation for the newincludeImmediateChildrenparameter, particularly its interaction with theincludeDescendantsflag since both parameters are related to hierarchy traversal.
health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/validator/ProjectValidator.java: Add validation invalidateSearchProjectRequestParamsmethod to ensure logical consistency between hierarchy-related flags.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
91-105: Verify parameter validation in ProjectValidator.Ensure that the
ProjectValidatorclass includes validation for the newincludeImmediateChildrenparameter, particularly its interaction withincludeDescendantsflag.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if ProjectValidator includes validation for the new parameter rg -A 5 "includeImmediateChildren" "health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/validator/"Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check if the validator class exists and see its content fd ProjectValidator.java health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/validator/ --exec cat {}Length of output: 37148
health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/repository/ProjectRepository.java (1)
Line range hint
72-95: Improve null handling and list operations.The code could be more robust with better null handling and list operations:
- The
descendantsvariable is initialized as null but used in a stream operation without proper null check- The list operations could be more concise
Consider this improvement:
- List<Project> descendants = null; + List<Project> descendants = new ArrayList<>(); if (includeImmediateChildren) { - descendants = getProjectImmediateDescendants(projects); + descendants.addAll(getProjectImmediateDescendants(projects)); } else if (includeDescendants) { - descendants = getProjectDescendants(projects); + descendants.addAll(getProjectDescendants(projects)); } - List<String> descendantsProjectIds = descendants == null || descendants.isEmpty() ? new ArrayList<>() : descendants.stream().map(Project::getId).collect(Collectors.toList()); + List<String> descendantsProjectIds = descendants.stream() + .map(Project::getId) + .collect(Collectors.toList());health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/web/controllers/ProjectApiController.java (1)
Line range hint
487-501: Consider introducing a search criteria object to improve maintainability.The method has 11 parameters which makes it hard to maintain and understand. Consider grouping these parameters into a dedicated search criteria object.
Example refactoring:
-public List<Project> searchProject( - ProjectRequest project, - Integer limit, - Integer offset, - String tenantId, - Long lastChangedSince, - Boolean includeDeleted, - Boolean includeAncestors, - Boolean includeDescendants, - Boolean includeImmediateChildren, - Long createdFrom, - Long createdTo) +public List<Project> searchProject(ProjectSearchCriteria criteria) { + // Use criteria object which encapsulates all search parameters + return projectService.searchProject(criteria); +} +@Data +@Builder +public class ProjectSearchCriteria { + private ProjectRequest project; + // Pagination + private Integer limit; + private Integer offset; + // Filtering + private String tenantId; + private Long lastChangedSince; + private Boolean includeDeleted; + private Long createdFrom; + private Long createdTo; + // Hierarchy inclusion + private Boolean includeAncestors; + private Boolean includeDescendants; + private Boolean includeImmediateChildren; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/repository/ProjectRepository.java(4 hunks)health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/repository/querybuilder/ProjectAddressQueryBuilder.java(1 hunks)health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/service/ProjectService.java(2 hunks)health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/web/controllers/ProjectApiController.java(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/repository/ProjectRepository.java (1)
72-72: Verify query performance and parameter usage.
The new includeImmediateChildren parameter introduces additional query complexity. Please ensure:
- The query performance is acceptable for large datasets
- The parameter is properly propagated through the service layer
Let's verify the usage of this parameter:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since I have enough information about the implementation and usage of the includeImmediateChildren parameter:
No performance concerns with the new parameter implementation
The codebase analysis shows that:
- The parameter is properly integrated into the repository layer's query builder (
ProjectAddressQueryBuilder.java) - The query execution uses prepared statements which ensures optimal query performance
- The parameter is consistently handled alongside existing similar parameters (
includeAncestors,includeDescendants)
The search results also confirm that the parameter propagation is properly implemented through the service layer, with appropriate validation and enrichment steps in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for service layer implementations that should be updated
rg -l "getProjects.*includeDescendants" --type java
# Search for potential places where the new parameter should be added
rg "new\s+ProjectSearch\s*\(" --type java
Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the usage of ProjectRepository.getProjects method
rg "getProjects\(" -A 3 --type java
# Let's also check for any ProjectSearch class usage or definition
rg "class ProjectSearch" --type java
rg "ProjectSearch" -A 2 --type java
# Check service layer implementations
rg "class.*ProjectService" --type java
Length of output: 43866
health-services/project/src/main/java/org/egov/project/web/controllers/ProjectApiController.java (2)
486-486: LGTM! Parameter addition follows best practices.
The new parameter includeImmediateChildren is well-documented and follows the existing pattern of similar parameters in the API.
Line range hint 502-506: LGTM! Response construction is well-implemented.
The response includes proper pagination metadata and follows the builder pattern for clean construction.
| @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ public List<Project> searchProject( | |||
| Boolean includeDeleted, | |||
| Boolean includeAncestors, | |||
| Boolean includeDescendants, | |||
| Boolean includeImmediateChildren, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add JavaDoc for the new parameter.
The new includeImmediateChildren parameter should be documented to clarify its purpose and behavior, especially its interaction with other inclusion flags (includeAncestors, includeDescendants).
Add parameter documentation:
/**
* Search for projects based on various criteria
* @param project Project request containing search criteria
* ...
+ * @param includeImmediateChildren When true, includes only the immediate children of matched projects
+ * This parameter takes precedence over includeDescendants
* ...
* @return List of matching projects
*/Also applies to: 105-105
| public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | ||
| StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY); | ||
| for (String projectId : projectIds) { | ||
| addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder); | ||
| queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )"); | ||
| preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add input validation for projectIds.
Consider adding input validation to handle null or empty projectIds list more gracefully.
Here's a suggested improvement:
public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) {
StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY);
+ if (projectIds == null || projectIds.isEmpty()) {
+ return queryBuilder.toString();
+ }
for (String projectId : projectIds) {
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(projectId)) {
+ continue;
+ }
addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder);
queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )");
preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | |
| StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY); | |
| for (String projectId : projectIds) { | |
| addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder); | |
| queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )"); | |
| preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId); | |
| } | |
| public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | |
| StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY); | |
| if (projectIds == null || projectIds.isEmpty()) { | |
| return queryBuilder.toString(); | |
| } | |
| for (String projectId : projectIds) { | |
| if (StringUtils.isBlank(projectId)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder); | |
| queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )"); | |
| preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId); | |
| } |
| /* Returns query to search for projects where project parent contains project Ids */ | ||
| public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | ||
| StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY); | ||
| for (String projectId : projectIds) { | ||
| addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder); | ||
| queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )"); | ||
| preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return queryBuilder.toString(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add method documentation for consistency.
The implementation looks good, but for consistency with other methods in the class, consider adding Javadoc documentation.
Add the following documentation:
+ /**
+ * Constructs SQL query to find immediate child projects based on parent project IDs.
+ *
+ * @param projectIds The list of parent project IDs to search for
+ * @param preparedStmtListDescendants The list to which prepared statement parameters will be added
+ * @return The constructed SQL query string
+ */
public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /* Returns query to search for projects where project parent contains project Ids */ | |
| public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | |
| StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY); | |
| for (String projectId : projectIds) { | |
| addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder); | |
| queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )"); | |
| preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId); | |
| } | |
| return queryBuilder.toString(); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Constructs SQL query to find immediate child projects based on parent project IDs. | |
| * | |
| * @param projectIds The list of parent project IDs to search for | |
| * @param preparedStmtListDescendants The list to which prepared statement parameters will be added | |
| * @return The constructed SQL query string | |
| */ | |
| public String getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | |
| StringBuilder queryBuilder = new StringBuilder(FETCH_PROJECT_ADDRESS_QUERY); | |
| for (String projectId : projectIds) { | |
| addConditionalClause(preparedStmtListDescendants, queryBuilder); | |
| queryBuilder.append(" ( prj.parent = ? )"); | |
| preparedStmtListDescendants.add(projectId); | |
| } | |
| return queryBuilder.toString(); | |
| } |
| /* Fetch projects where project parent for projects in db contains project ID of requested project.*/ | ||
| private List<Project> getProjectImmediateDescendants(List<Project> projects) { | ||
| List<String> requestProjectIds = projects.stream().map(Project::getId).collect(Collectors.toList()); | ||
|
|
||
| List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
| log.info("Fetching immediate descendant projects"); | ||
|
|
||
| return getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(requestProjectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance logging for better debugging.
The current logging could be more informative by including the number of projects being processed and retrieved.
Consider enhancing the logging:
private List<Project> getProjectImmediateDescendants(List<Project> projects) {
List<String> requestProjectIds = projects.stream().map(Project::getId).collect(Collectors.toList());
List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants = new ArrayList<>();
- log.info("Fetching immediate descendant projects");
+ log.info("Fetching immediate descendant projects for {} parent projects", projects.size());
- return getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(requestProjectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants);
+ List<Project> descendants = getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(requestProjectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants);
+ log.info("Found {} immediate descendant projects", descendants.size());
+ return descendants;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /* Fetch projects where project parent for projects in db contains project ID of requested project.*/ | |
| private List<Project> getProjectImmediateDescendants(List<Project> projects) { | |
| List<String> requestProjectIds = projects.stream().map(Project::getId).collect(Collectors.toList()); | |
| List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants = new ArrayList<>(); | |
| log.info("Fetching immediate descendant projects"); | |
| return getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(requestProjectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants); | |
| } | |
| /* Fetch projects where project parent for projects in db contains project ID of requested project.*/ | |
| private List<Project> getProjectImmediateDescendants(List<Project> projects) { | |
| List<String> requestProjectIds = projects.stream().map(Project::getId).collect(Collectors.toList()); | |
| List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants = new ArrayList<>(); | |
| log.info("Fetching immediate descendant projects for {} parent projects", projects.size()); | |
| List<Project> descendants = getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(requestProjectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants); | |
| log.info("Found {} immediate descendant projects", descendants.size()); | |
| return descendants; | |
| } |
| /* Fetch Project descendants based on Project ids */ | ||
| private List<Project> getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | ||
| String query = queryBuilder.getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(projectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants); | ||
| List<Project> projects = jdbcTemplate.query(query, addressRowMapper, preparedStmtListDescendants.toArray()); | ||
| log.info("Fetched project immediate descendants list based on given Project Ids"); | ||
| return projects; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add input validation for projectIds.
The method should validate the input parameters to prevent potential issues with null or empty lists.
Consider adding validation:
private List<Project> getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) {
+ if (projectIds == null || projectIds.isEmpty()) {
+ log.debug("No project IDs provided for fetching immediate descendants");
+ return new ArrayList<>();
+ }
String query = queryBuilder.getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(projectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants);
List<Project> projects = jdbcTemplate.query(query, addressRowMapper, preparedStmtListDescendants.toArray());
log.info("Fetched project immediate descendants list based on given Project Ids");
return projects;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /* Fetch Project descendants based on Project ids */ | |
| private List<Project> getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | |
| String query = queryBuilder.getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(projectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants); | |
| List<Project> projects = jdbcTemplate.query(query, addressRowMapper, preparedStmtListDescendants.toArray()); | |
| log.info("Fetched project immediate descendants list based on given Project Ids"); | |
| return projects; | |
| } | |
| /* Fetch Project descendants based on Project ids */ | |
| private List<Project> getProjectsImmediateDescendantsBasedOnProjectIds(List<String> projectIds, List<Object> preparedStmtListDescendants) { | |
| if (projectIds == null || projectIds.isEmpty()) { | |
| log.debug("No project IDs provided for fetching immediate descendants"); | |
| return new ArrayList<>(); | |
| } | |
| String query = queryBuilder.getProjectImmediateDescendantsSearchQueryBasedOnIds(projectIds, preparedStmtListDescendants); | |
| List<Project> projects = jdbcTemplate.query(query, addressRowMapper, preparedStmtListDescendants.toArray()); | |
| log.info("Fetched project immediate descendants list based on given Project Ids"); | |
| return projects; | |
| } |
updating task status for handling validation failure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
health-services/libraries/health-services-models/pom.xml(1 hunks)health-services/libraries/health-services-models/src/main/java/org/egov/common/models/project/TaskStatus.java(1 hunks)health-services/project/pom.xml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
health-services/project/pom.xml (1)
Learnt from: kanishq-egov
PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#847
File: health-services/libraries/health-services-common/pom.xml:11-11
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:17.779Z
Learning: Not all services in the health campaign services project are required to move to newer versions like `1.0.17-dev-SNAPSHOT`, as per kanishq-egov's guidance.
health-services/libraries/health-services-models/src/main/java/org/egov/common/models/project/TaskStatus.java (1)
Learnt from: kanishq-egov
PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#847
File: health-services/libraries/health-services-models/src/main/java/org/egov/common/models/project/TaskStatus.java:6-12
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:11.591Z
Learning: The `TaskStatus` enum values are used for SMC, Bednet, and IRS campaigns in the health campaign services project.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
health-services/libraries/health-services-models/src/main/java/org/egov/common/models/project/TaskStatus.java (1)
58-63: LGTM! Well-documented enum value addition
The new BENEFICIARY_INELIGIBLE status is properly documented and aligns well with health campaign requirements where beneficiaries might not meet eligibility criteria.
| /** | ||
| * Indicates that the beneficiary is ineligible. | ||
| * This status means that the individual or entity for whom the task | ||
| * was intended was referred to some institution | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix copy-paste error in JavaDoc comment
The JavaDoc comment for BENEFICIARY_REFERRED incorrectly states "Indicates that the beneficiary is ineligible" which appears to be copied from the previous enum value.
Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
/**
- * Indicates that the beneficiary is ineligible.
+ * Indicates that the beneficiary has been referred.
* This status means that the individual or entity for whom the task
* was intended was referred to some institution
*/📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /** | |
| * Indicates that the beneficiary is ineligible. | |
| * This status means that the individual or entity for whom the task | |
| * was intended was referred to some institution | |
| */ | |
| /** | |
| * Indicates that the beneficiary has been referred. | |
| * This status means that the individual or entity for whom the task | |
| * was intended was referred to some institution | |
| */ |
| @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ | |||
| <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> | |||
| <groupId>org.egov.common</groupId> | |||
| <artifactId>health-services-models</artifactId> | |||
| <version>1.0.21-SNAPSHOT</version> | |||
| <version>1.0.21-impel-SNAPSHOT</version> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Version change requires coordination across multiple services
The version change to 1.0.21-impel-SNAPSHOT requires attention as:
- Most health services are currently using version
1.0.20-SNAPSHOT - Only the project service is using the new
1.0.21-impel-SNAPSHOTversion - Some services are using even older versions (product:
1.0.7-SNAPSHOT, egov-hrms:1.0.12-SNAPSHOT)
This inconsistency in versions across services needs to be addressed:
- Either roll back to
1.0.21-SNAPSHOTto maintain consistency - Or coordinate version updates across all dependent services if the
impelqualifier is necessary
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the rationale for version qualifier change
The version change from 1.0.21-SNAPSHOT to 1.0.21-impel-SNAPSHOT seems unrelated to the PR's objective of updating code for immediate children search. Please clarify:
- Why is the 'impel' qualifier being added?
- Are there any breaking changes that require this version distinction?
- Have all dependent services been tested with this new version?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other services that might be affected by this version change
rg -l "health-services-models.*1\.0\.21-SNAPSHOT"
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for dependencies on health-services-models
rg -l "health-services-models"
# Also search for any pom.xml files that might reference this dependency
fd "pom.xml" --exec grep -l "health-services-models" {}
Length of output: 1094
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the version references in the dependent projects' pom files
for pom in $(fd "pom.xml" --exclude "health-services-models"); do
echo "=== $pom ==="
grep -A 2 -B 2 "health-services-models" "$pom" || true
done
Length of output: 6007
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
includeImmediateChildrento the project search functionality, allowing users to filter results to include only immediate child projects.BENEFICIARY_INELIGIBLEandBENEFICIARY_REFERRED.Enhancements
Documentation
includeImmediateChildrenparameter for clarity.Version Updates
health-services-modelsdependency from1.0.21-SNAPSHOTto1.0.22-impel-SNAPSHOT.