-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
small writing changes, unanimous agreement instead of consensus
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
# Governance of The Repository | ||
|
||
The current authors (as of Feb 2024 the current authors are Nahomi Ichino, Maarten Voors and Jake Bowers) will decide to accept or reject changes to this repository via unanimous consensus. They will also decide whether a new contribution merits inclusion of that contributor as an author. All three of them commit to deliberate quickly so that proposed changes receive responses without undue delay. | ||
The current authors (as of Feb 2024 the current authors are Nahomi Ichino, Maarten Voors and Jake Bowers) will decide to accept or reject changes to this repository via unanimous agreement. They will also decide whether a new contribution merits inclusion of that contributor as an author. All current authors commit to deliberate quickly so that proposed changes receive responses without undue delay. | ||
|
||
Once a person becomes an author, they receive full authority: rather than unanimous consensus among three people, for example, when a fourth person is added, decisions about changes would then be governed by consensus among four people. We can imagine changing the governance model if the number of authors make consensus and unanimity unweildly. | ||
Once a person becomes an author, they receive full authority: rather than unanimous agreement among three people, for example, when a fourth person is added, decisions about changes would then be governed by consensus among four people. We can imagine changing the governance model if the number of authors make consensus and unanimity unweildly. |