Amended README

README.md

@@ -96,16 +96,22 @@ Clearly, QGIS is - at present - many times faster (between 6.6 and 8.7 times). I
 That said, tiles generated by RasterioXYZ appear to exhibit better horizontal accuracy and fewer resampling-derived artefacts than those of QGIS:
 
 ![alt text](doc/gallery/Sentinel2_T17RLK_Venice_Municipal_Airport.png "Source image (EPSG:32617)")
+
+Source image (EPSG:32617) without (T) and with (B) OSM overlay.
+
 ![alt text](doc/gallery/Sentinel2_T17RLK_Venice_Municipal_Airport_OSM_overlay.png "Source image, OSM overlay")
-Source image (EPSG:32617) without (L) and with (R) OSM overlay.
 
 ![alt text](doc/gallery/QGIS_T17RLK_Venice_Municipal_Airport.png "QGIS-tiled zoom level 12")
+
+QGIS-generated tiles without (T) and with (B) OSM overlay.
+
 ![alt text](doc/gallery/QGIS_T17RLK_Venice_Municipal_Airport_OSM_overlay.png "QGIS-tiled zoom level 12, OSM overlay")
-QGIS-generated tiles without (L) and with (R) OSM overlay.
 
 ![alt text](doc/gallery/RasterioXYZ_T17RLK_Venice_Municipal_Airport.png "RasterioXYZ-tiled zoom level 12")
+
+RasterioXYZ-generated tiles without (T) and with (B) OSM overlay.
+
 ![alt text](doc/gallery/RasterioXYZ_T17RLK_Venice_Municipal_Airport_OSM_overlay.png "RasterioXYZ-tiled zoom level 12, OSM overlay")
-RasterioXYZ-generated tiles without (L) and with (R) OSM overlay.
 
 # Roadmap
 A number of improvements are possible and/or planned. Sorted by priority, these are as follows.