Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

running aequitas without label_value #115

Open
OliwiaDetmers opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

running aequitas without label_value #115

OliwiaDetmers opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@OliwiaDetmers
Copy link

In case the ground truth for the model is not available it should still be possible to run aequitas to get the metrics that do not depend on this input. Right now the Group() class requires label_value as input but it's not needed for metrics such as predictive positive ratio. One can input label_value with eg. 0 or 1 but then some supervised metrics will still be calculated incorrectly based on this input which can be confusing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant