-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarification of Experiment
parameters ndir
, idir
and sampleor
#137
Comments
Hello,
I try to answer below. I think almost every first time user has similar
questions. I hope my answers below will make things more clear.
Note: I did not try to understand your particular geometry, but hope my
general answers are sufficient for you to figure it out. If not please ask
back.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:35 PM Florin Boariu ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello,
I have questions regarding the usage of the experiment description class.
I'm new to both xrayutilities and to X-ray data analysis, so I probably
make a perfect combination of opinionated *and* clueless :-) I apologize
in advance for that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I am trying to understand the parameters of xrayutilities.Experiment,
respectively xrayutilities.HXRD. In particular I'm stuck at the exact
meaning of idir (inplane direction), ndir (sample normal) and sampleor
(sample "orientation").
I understand that idir is the direction of the X-ray beam relative to the
sample, in a lab coordinate system (typically the Y axis in a SPEC-like
setup <https://www.certif.com/spec_manual/fourc_4_1.html>).
I think here might be already one core misunderstanding. In order to orient
a crystal in the laboratory coordinate system one needs to know 2
non-collinear (best orthogonal) crystal directions and their orientation in
the laboratory coordinate system.
So idir and ndir are actually crystal directions. I typically specify them
as
hxrd = xu.HXRD(InP.Q(1, 1, -2), InP.Q(1, 1, 1))
https://xrayutilities.sourceforge.io/#hello-world (see line 40 in the code
example)
But I don't understand the meaning of ndir and sampleor, in particular
inhowfar they differ from one another.
ndir is the "surface normal of [my] sample", and needs to be
perpendicular to idir (at zero angles only, right?), but apparently it's
sampleor that *actually* tells me where the surface of the sample is.
corresponding to idir and ndir (crystal coordinates) are the laboratory
vectors specifying the primary beam direction r_i and sampleor
r_i can be specified in QConversion
https://xrayutilities.sourceforge.io/xrayutilities.html?highlight=qconversion#xrayutilities.experiment.QConversion
r_i defaults to the y direction as is typically used in spec for the HXRD
class.
and yes all these directions are laboratory directions (therefore need to
be determined at zero goniometer angles).
-
Documentatino states: *"sampleor='det' means the surface is in the
plane spanned by the inner most detector rotation and perpendicular to the
primary beam."* Our detector rotates (only) around Z+, see below. If I
understand this correctly, it's the X'Y'-face of my sample that would be
designated as "the surface" in this case, right?
the "plane spanned by the inner most detector rotation" is actually the
x-y plane for a detector rotation around z. So sampleor=det with r_i=y
would therefore mean that ndir given above points along x (because it is
assumed to be perpendicular to primary beam inside the detector rotation
plane). Also note that the detector rotation plane is always only
determined from the inner most rotation axis, so multiple or single
detector rotation axis make no difference here.
-
So xrayutilities would calculate the actual "in action" orientation of
my sample using the Phi rotation data?
the actual sample orientation is of course calculated using all sample
angles.
-
Documentation states: *"sampleor='sam' means [...] along the innermost
stample circles rotation direction"*. Our sample rotates along Phi
lastly; Phi rotates along the X' direction of the sample (which, when all
angles are zero, coincides with X of the lab). Does this mean that I'd be
selecting the Y'Z' plane as "the surface"?
If the innermost sample circle is phi which is along x then equivalent to
above this would mean ndir points along x. For a standard Four circle
geometry 'det', 'sam' are equivalent.
-
Why do I need to specify ndir at all, then? If all that's needed is a
perpendicular direction, and it's ultimately *not* this parameter that
determines the surface normal, surely one can be constructed? What
difference does it make if I write, for instance, ndir=(1,0,0) or
ndir=(0,0,1), or even ndir=(.5,0,.5), if the in-planedirection was
along Y (i.e. (0,1,0)?
both idir and ndir are ultimately only needed if one needs to get from the
HKL coordinates to angle or angle to Q/HKL in the crystal coordinate
system. If you want to get HKL coordinates from the goniometer angles I
hope you see that the different directions actually matter.
Therefore ndir enters in HXRD.Q2Ang (with trans=True (default)) an Ang2HKL.
I already a long time plan to disentangle these settings a bit to make the
user specify them only when needed but did not get to it yet. Essentially
this issue #98
-
Is sampleor='x+' the same as sampleor='sam' here? Or would the former
actually mean that the sample is *always* pointing "up" regardless of
apparatus angles, and thus only be equivalent to 'sam' for zero angles?
yes thats the same here. The special value 'sam' and 'det' exist since its
often useful to change the goniometer definition but the sample stays
mounted in the same way on the goniometer.
… —
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#137>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACKZJFJKQFKPO35C3CJJYCLVS5ETFANCNFSM5263PT4A>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I have questions regarding the usage of the experiment description class.
I'm new to both
xrayutilities
and to X-ray data analysis, so I probably make a perfect combination of opinionated and clueless :-) I apologize in advance for that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯I am trying to understand the parameters of
xrayutilities.Experiment
, respectivelyxrayutilities.HXRD
. In particular I'm stuck at the exact meaning ofidir
(inplane direction),ndir
(sample normal) andsampleor
(sample "orientation").I understand that
idir
is the direction of the X-ray beam relative to the sample, in a lab coordinate system (typically the Y axis in a SPEC-like setup).But I don't understand the meaning of
ndir
andsampleor
, in particular inhowfar they differ from one another.ndir
is the "surface normal of [my] sample", and needs to be perpendicular toidir
(at zero angles only, right?), but apparently it'ssampleor
that actually tells me where the surface of the sample is.Documentatino states: "
sampleor='det'
means the surface is in the plane spanned by the inner most detector rotation and perpendicular to the primary beam." Our detector rotates (only) around Z+, see below. If I understand this correctly, it's the X'Y'-face of my sample that would be designated as "the surface" in this case, right? Soxrayutilities
would calculate the actual "in action" orientation of my sample using the Phi rotation data?Documentation states: "
sampleor='sam'
means [...] along the innermost stample circles rotation direction". Our sample rotates along Phi lastly; Phi rotates along the X' direction of the sample (which, when all angles are zero, coincides with X of the lab). Does this mean that I'd be selecting the Y'Z' plane as "the surface"?Why do I need to specify
ndir
at all, then? If all that's needed is a perpendicular direction, and it's ultimately not this parameter that determines the surface normal, surely one can be constructed? What difference does it make if I write, for instance,ndir=(1,0,0)
orndir=(0,0,1)
, or evenndir=(.5,0,.5)
, if the in-planedirection was along Y (i.e.(0,1,0)
?Is
sampleor='x+'
the same assampleor='sam'
here? Or would the former actually mean that the sample is always pointing "up" regardless of apparatus angles, and thus only be equivalent to'sam'
for zero angles?I'll try to describe our experimental setup, maybe this makes things clearer.
The experimental setup
Here is the experimental setup I'm trying to work with. I also apologize in advance for my ASCII art skills :-) Apparently it's a four-circle setup (angles Phi, Omega, Chi, 2-Theta), approximately like this:
The sample and its coordinate system
Angle definitions of the sample; from outer circle to inner circle:
Detector rotation:
Thanks in advance for any hints.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: