Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add back-to-top scroll up button in readme #509

Closed
T-Fathima opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #513
Closed

Add back-to-top scroll up button in readme #509

T-Fathima opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #513
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation gssoc-ext GSSOX'24 Extended hacktoberfest issue under hacktoberfest hacktoberfest-accepted Hacktoberfest level 1 10 Points issue

Comments

@T-Fathima
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to add back-to-top scroll up button in readme for easier navigation in lengthy readme files and enhance the user experience.
@dhairyagothi Please assign it to me.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Thank you for raising this issue! We'll look into it as soon as possible. Please ensure that the issue is not duplicate, and you read CONTRIBUTING.md carefully. Your contributions are highly appreciated! 😊

@dhairyagothi dhairyagothi added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation level 1 10 Points issue gssoc-ext GSSOX'24 Extended hacktoberfest-accepted Hacktoberfest hacktoberfest issue under hacktoberfest labels Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Hello @T-Fathima! Your issue #509 has been closed. Thank you for your contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation gssoc-ext GSSOX'24 Extended hacktoberfest issue under hacktoberfest hacktoberfest-accepted Hacktoberfest level 1 10 Points issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants