-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support parallelization of conf filter #268
Support parallelization of conf filter #268
Conversation
Signed-off-by: zjgemi <liuxin_zijian@163.com>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to several classes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the configuration filtering process. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TrajRenderLammps
participant ConfFilters
participant ConfFilter
participant DistanceConfFilter
User->>TrajRenderLammps: request get_confs
TrajRenderLammps->>ConfFilters: call check(ms)
ConfFilters->>ConfFilter: call batched_check(frames)
ConfFilter-->>ConfFilters: return validity list
ConfFilters-->>TrajRenderLammps: return valid configurations
TrajRenderLammps-->>User: return configurations
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DistanceConfFilter
User->>DistanceConfFilter: request batched_check(frames)
DistanceConfFilter->>ProcessPoolExecutor: execute checks
ProcessPoolExecutor-->>DistanceConfFilter: return results
DistanceConfFilter-->>User: return valid frames
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
dpgen2/exploration/render/traj_render_lammps.py (1)
133-133
: Approve the simplification with suggestions for improvementThe change simplifies the filtering process and aligns with the PR objective of supporting parallelization. It likely improves performance by leveraging batch processing in
ConfFilters
.However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add error handling to ensure
conf_filters.check(ms)
returns the expectedMultiSystems
object.- Update the method's docstring to reflect the new behavior and requirements of
conf_filters
.Consider applying this diff to improve error handling and documentation:
def get_confs( self, trajs: Union[List[Path], List[HDF5Dataset]], id_selected: List[List[int]], type_map: Optional[List[str]] = None, conf_filters: Optional["ConfFilters"] = None, optional_outputs: Optional[List[Path]] = None, ) -> dpdata.MultiSystems: + """ + Get configurations from trajectories and apply filters. + + :param conf_filters: Must implement a `check` method that accepts and returns a MultiSystems object. + """ # ... (existing code) if conf_filters is not None: - ms = conf_filters.check(ms) + filtered_ms = conf_filters.check(ms) + if not isinstance(filtered_ms, dpdata.MultiSystems): + raise TypeError("conf_filters.check() must return a MultiSystems object") + ms = filtered_ms return msdpgen2/exploration/selector/conf_filter.py (1)
55-55
: Use list comprehension for clarityConsider using a list comprehension instead of
list(map(...))
for better readability:- return list(map(self.check, frames)) + return [self.check(frame) for frame in frames]tests/exploration/test_conf_filter.py (1)
53-56
: Enhance code readability by commenting on coordinate modifications.The direct manipulation of
faked_sys["coords"]
modifies specific frames and coordinates, but the intent is not immediately clear. Adding comments to explain the purpose of these assignments will improve code clarity for future maintainers.dpgen2/exploration/selector/distance_conf_filter.py (3)
214-217
: Improve clarity ofdoc_max_workers
documentationTo enhance understanding, consider rephrasing the documentation string for
max_workers
.Apply this diff to update the documentation:
doc_max_workers = ( - "The maximum number of processes used to filter configurations, None represents as many as the processors of the machine, and 1 for serial" + "The maximum number of processes used to filter configurations. None uses all available processors, and 1 forces serial execution." )
300-303
: Enhance documentation formax_workers
inBoxSkewnessConfFilter.args
Consider updating the documentation string for better clarity.
Apply this diff:
doc_max_workers = ( - "The maximum number of processes used to filter configurations, None represents as many as the processors of the machine, and 1 for serial" + "The maximum number of processes used to filter configurations. None uses all available processors, and 1 forces serial execution." )
378-381
: Refine thedoc_max_workers
text inBoxLengthFilter.args
Updating the documentation string can provide clearer guidance to users.
Apply this diff:
doc_max_workers = ( - "The maximum number of processes used to filter configurations, None represents as many as the processors of the machine, and 1 for serial" + "The maximum number of processes used to filter configurations. None uses all available processors, and 1 forces serial execution." )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- dpgen2/exploration/render/traj_render_lammps.py (1 hunks)
- dpgen2/exploration/selector/conf_filter.py (3 hunks)
- dpgen2/exploration/selector/distance_conf_filter.py (10 hunks)
- tests/exploration/test_conf_filter.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/exploration/test_conf_filter.py (2)
100-104
: Confirm that filtering with no matching frames behaves correctly.The test checks that no frames are selected when none meet the filter criteria. Ensure that
sel_ms.get_nframes()
correctly returns0
, and that the system handles empty results without errors.
58-61
: Verify the correctness of filter chaining and result extraction.Ensure that chaining the
.add()
method works as intended withConfFilters
, and thatfilters.check(ms)[0]
accurately retrieves the filtered system. Verify that the filtering logic applies all filters in sequence and produces the expected results.You can run the following script to confirm the filter chaining behavior:
✅ Verification successful
Filter chaining and result extraction verified to function correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that ConfFilters correctly chains filters and returns expected results. # Test: Search for the implementation details of ConfFilters. rg 'class ConfFilters' -A 15 # Test: Check usages of the .add() and .check() methods to confirm chaining. rg 'filters.add' -A 2Length of output: 2176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `check` method in the ConfFilters class. ast-grep --pattern $'class ConfFilters { $$$ check($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use ripgrep to locate the `check` method within the `ConfFilters` class and retrieve its implementation. # Search for the `ConfFilters` class and extract the class definition context rg 'class ConfFilters' -A 50 # Specifically search for the `def check` method within the `ConfFilters` class and extract its implementation rg -C 5 'def check' dpgen2/exploration/selector/conf_filter.pyLength of output: 2930
dpgen2/exploration/selector/distance_conf_filter.py (6)
2-4
: Approved: ImportingProcessPoolExecutor
for parallel processingThe addition of
ProcessPoolExecutor
is appropriate for enabling parallel execution in thebatched_check
methods.
194-203
: Verify thatdpdata.System
instances are serializable for multiprocessingSince
ProcessPoolExecutor
leverages multiprocessing, confirm thatdpdata.System
objects inframes
are picklable. If they contain unpicklable attributes, this could result in runtime errors when executingexecutor.map
.
246-247
: Approved: Addedmax_workers
parameter toBoxSkewnessConfFilter
Including
max_workers
enhances the filter by enabling parallel processing in thebatched_check
method.
280-289
: Verify multiprocessing compatibility inbatched_check
ofBoxSkewnessConfFilter
Ensure that the frames passed to
ProcessPoolExecutor
are compatible with multiprocessing. Serialization issues withdpdata.System
instances could cause errors during parallel execution.
324-325
: Approved: Introducedmax_workers
toBoxLengthFilter
for parallelismThe addition of
max_workers
allows for parallel processing, improving the performance of thebatched_check
method.
358-367
: Confirm serialization of frames inBoxLengthFilter.batched_check
Verify that the objects in
frames
are serializable to prevent issues when usingProcessPoolExecutor
.
selected_idx = sum( | ||
[[(i, j) for j in range(s.get_nframes())] for i, s in enumerate(ms)], [] | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize list flattening for performance
Using sum(..., [])
to flatten a list of lists can be inefficient. Consider using itertools.chain.from_iterable
for better performance, especially with large datasets:
import itertools
selected_idx = list(itertools.chain.from_iterable(
[(i, j) for j in range(s.get_nframes())] for i, s in enumerate(ms)
))
@@ -27,110 +27,78 @@ def check( | |||
self, | |||
frame: dpdata.System, | |||
) -> bool: | |||
return True | |||
return frame["coords"][0][0][0] > 0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling to prevent potential index errors in FooFilter.check
.
The current implementation assumes that frame["coords"][0][0][0]
exists, which could lead to an IndexError
if the coordinate data doesn't have the expected dimensions. Consider adding validation to ensure the coordinate array is properly structured before accessing it.
class BarFilter(ConfFilter): | ||
def check( | ||
self, | ||
frame: dpdata.System, | ||
) -> bool: | ||
return frame["coords"][0][0][1] > 0.0 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling to prevent potential index errors in BarFilter.check
.
Similar to FooFilter
, this method assumes that frame["coords"][0][0][1]
exists. To avoid potential IndexError
exceptions, ensure that the coordinate data is validated for the expected dimensions before accessing it.
class BazFilter(ConfFilter): | ||
def check( | ||
self, | ||
frame: dpdata.System, | ||
) -> bool: | ||
return frame["coords"][0][0][2] > 0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling to prevent potential index errors in BazFilter.check
.
This method also assumes that frame["coords"][0][0][2]
exists. Adding checks to validate the coordinate data's dimensions can prevent runtime errors due to unexpected data structures.
faked_sys["coords"][1][0] = 1.0 | ||
faked_sys["coords"][3][0] = 3.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring repetitive test setup code for consistency.
The setup code for faked_sys
, ms
, and filters
is repeated across multiple test methods. Refactoring this code into a helper method can improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
Also applies to: 71-74
faked_sys["coords"][0][0] = 0.5 | ||
faked_sys["coords"][1][0] = 1.0 | ||
faked_sys["coords"][2][0] = 2.0 | ||
faked_sys["coords"][3][0] = 3.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated code to enhance maintainability.
Similar to previous tests, the repeated setup of systems and filters can be consolidated into a shared method or fixture. This will make the tests cleaner and easier to manage.
Also applies to: 87-90
def __init__(self, max_workers=None, custom_safe_dist=None, safe_dist_ratio=1.0): | ||
self.max_workers = max_workers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure default value of max_workers
aligns with expected behavior
Using max_workers=None
allows ProcessPoolExecutor
to utilize all available CPUs, which may lead to resource contention on systems with many cores. Consider setting a sensible default or providing guidance to users on choosing an appropriate value based on their environment.
selected_idx = sum( | ||
[[(i, j) for j in range(s.get_nframes())] for i, s in enumerate(ms)], [] | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not clear for me why we need a sum
here. You may also consider the suggestion by rabbitAI
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #268 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.65% 83.62% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 104 104
Lines 6028 6057 +29
==========================================
+ Hits 5043 5065 +22
- Misses 985 992 +7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: zjgemi <liuxin_zijian@163.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
dpgen2/exploration/selector/conf_filter.py (2)
38-55
: LGTM: Newbatched_check
methodThe new
batched_check
method is a great addition for enabling batch processing of configurations. The implementation is concise and efficient.Consider using a list comprehension instead of
map
for slightly better readability:def batched_check(self, frames: List[dpdata.System]) -> List[bool]: return [self.check(frame) for frame in frames]This change is optional and doesn't affect performance significantly.
75-89
: LGTM with suggestions: Improvedcheck
method implementationThe new implementation correctly handles multiple systems and frames, efficiently using the
batched_check
method of each filter. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
Consider using more descriptive variable names, e.g.,
system_index
instead ofi
andframe_index
instead ofj
.The nested loops for creating
selected_idx
can be replaced with a list comprehension for better readability and potentially better performance:selected_idx = [(i, j) for i, s in enumerate(ms) for j in range(s.get_nframes())]
- Consider using
enumerate
in the final loop for better readability:for i, system_indices in enumerate(selected_idx_list): if system_indices: ms2.append(ms[i].sub_system(system_indices))These changes will improve code readability without affecting functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- dpgen2/exploration/selector/conf_filter.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
dpgen2/exploration/selector/conf_filter.py (2)
9-11
: LGTM: Import change for type hintingThe addition of
List
import fromtyping
is appropriate for the new type hints in thebatched_check
method.
73-74
: Verify impact of signature changeThe change in the
check
method signature fromdpdata.System
todpdata.MultiSystems
for both input and output is appropriate for the new batched processing approach.Please ensure that all calls to this method throughout the codebase have been updated to accommodate this change. Run the following script to verify:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BarFilter
,BazFilter
) with specific checks for frame coordinates.Bug Fixes
Tests