Contradiction between Energy and Force Accuracy in DPGEN Training #1692
Unanswered
zhangyu0104
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Dear Yu, The model trained during dpgen iterations pay little attention on the accuracy of energy. Note that we select configurations for labeling based on force criteria. For a production model, one needs a long-train and perhaps a few rounds of training (with --init-model option) with larger energy loss prefactors. Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear all,
I am encountering an issue with the model accuracy while training iteratively using DPGEN for a Fe-H binary system, where the magnetism need to be considered. After several iterations, the accuracy ratio has improved from 70% to over 95%. However, when testing the model with
dp_test
, I noticed that while the root mean square error (RMSE) for force is relatively small, the RMSE for energy is significantly large.I am not sure whether this issue is related to the incorporation of magnetic effects. However, regardless of whether I fix the total magnetic moment or only set the initial magnetic moment, the energy RMSE continues to increase gradually with each iteration, while the force RMSE decreases. I also attempted to adjust the prefactors of energy and force during training, but this has not led to any improvements.
My input parameter file is attached below. I would greatly appreciate any insights or suggestions on how to address this issue.
param.json
Best regards,
Yu Zhang
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions