Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #3067. Rename the static access shorthand feature experiment flag #3068

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

@sgrekhov sgrekhov commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@eernstg eernstg merged commit b14b080 into dart-lang:master Feb 6, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
copybara-service bot pushed a commit to dart-lang/sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
…(and roll co19 to b14b080)

We've decided to rename enum shorthands to dot shorthands. It describes the entire feature better. It's not only for enum values. We'll update the experiment name before the implementation goes in, that way our users can use a flag that matches the actual feature name.

Additionally, roll co19 to b14b0802e696a60c79b00d0f052e26fb986f0faf so we can avoid an infra failure with co19 using what's now an unknown feature flag (enum-shorthands).

2025-02-06 sgrekhov22@gmail.com Fixes dart-lang/co19#3067. Rename the static access shorthand feature experiment flag (dart-lang/co19#3068)

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:analyzer-linux-release-try
Bug: #57037
Change-Id: I031e3bce8166145b24dbb77acf259d78e6e00f0a
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/407603
Reviewed-by: Alexander Thomas <athom@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kallen Tu <kallentu@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants