fix(python): ensure Raises: section is after Returns: section in google style

[hassec]

Changes google_docstrings.lua template to ensure the Raises: section is after the Returns: section, as is shown in the Google Style Guide

Closes #193

[ColinKennedy]

I don't see anything in Google's styleguide saying that Raises is meant to come beforehand, just a couple examples where it does. Luckily Google does have a way to seek clarification. e.g. in the past I asked + PRed to google/styleguide#505

We've got a custom pylint GoogleDocstringChecker internally that verifies the our style of docstring format. My internal response to this kind of question is generally to defer to whatever our lint checker implementation asks for when it comes to details like this. Running your final example through that, it likes it. Which is a strong indicator that we allow that nice readable form. :)

It'd be good to get confirmation before moving forward with this PR.

[hassec]

@ColinKennedy let's see if someone from Google replies. Otherwise, I'd argue that w/o guidance, following the Google examples would be the more reasonable default, or make it configurable.

[hassec]

@ColinKennedy @danymat, now that we've got a response on the google issue, how do you feel about moving forward?

[ColinKennedy]

Yes that's fine by me. Though I would have rather Google's style guide explicitly say it in the text itself. The ultimate test, I've found, is to just submit a PR that directly edits the style guide with your suggested wording and see if they merge it.

Though I personally really think it's a mistake to put Raises: after Returns:. After all, raising always interrupts before a regular return so it makes sense to have it come before it in the docs. And Args: of course is the entry point to a function. So it flows Args:, Returns: or Args:, (intteruption), Raises:, Returns: But that's just my opinion.

Anyway, I'm not sure if @danymat still maintains this repo, I don't have write access. You still out there buddy?

[danymat]

Anyway, I'm not sure if @danymat still maintains this repo, I don't have write access. You still out there buddy?

Indeed, maintaining it is becoming quite hard due to my new life as security researcher
@ColinKennedy, if you are interested, I could grant you write access to the repository in a first time, to ease the PR processes

Related to this fix, as I read in the mentioned PR from google style guide, we got a suitable response. I will then proceed with the changes; remember that you can still reorder the template by yourself on your config

[ColinKennedy]

@danymat yes I'm interested! If you want chat about any details related to what you're comfortable with me approving or merging, my email is in my profile