Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade rate-limiting to ibc-go v10 #234

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wllmshao
Copy link
Contributor

@wllmshao wllmshao commented Feb 20, 2025

  • upgrade rate-limiting to ibc-go/v10
  • add rate-limiting/v2, which implements an IBCMiddleware that implements github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v10/modules/core/api/IBCModule
  • bump version from v8 to v9

@wllmshao wllmshao changed the title Ws/rate limit ibcv10 chore: upgrade rate-limiting to ibc-go v10 Feb 20, 2025
@wllmshao wllmshao force-pushed the ws/rate_limit_ibcv10 branch from 42cef65 to 2a4c7e7 Compare February 25, 2025 16:55
@wllmshao wllmshao force-pushed the ws/rate_limit_ibcv10 branch from 8e9f34d to 6567a34 Compare February 25, 2025 17:11
@wllmshao wllmshao force-pushed the ws/rate_limit_ibcv10 branch from 6567a34 to cfc34a7 Compare February 25, 2025 17:19
@wllmshao wllmshao marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 17:28

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's work on cleaning this up after we get a release candidate cut. I think the ibc team is going to replace some of these and for the others we should move to using the Denom type.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I definitely think we need to test more before full release.

@Eric-Warehime
Copy link

Also looks like some of the checks are failing because of #226 I think we can probably get that fixed pretty easily.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants