Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce putAll(Properties) #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gastaldi
Copy link
Contributor

@gastaldi gastaldi commented Jul 8, 2024

  • This is useful when you need to copy all the values from a java.util.Properties to this structure

@quintesse
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @gastaldi . Is this functionality you need right now or is there no rush?

@gastaldi
Copy link
Contributor Author

gastaldi commented Jul 8, 2024

Hi @gastaldi . Is this functionality you need right now or is there no rush?

No rush, this is a missing method I was hoping to use for persisting existing Properties objects using this library without changing the API

@quintesse
Copy link
Collaborator

No rush, this is a missing method I was hoping to use for persisting existing Properties objects using this library without changing the API

Good reason 👍

@gastaldi gastaldi force-pushed the put_all branch 3 times, most recently from 640ef62 to ef6826e Compare July 8, 2024 18:31
- This is useful when you need to copy all the values from a `java.util.Properties` to this structure
@gastaldi gastaldi requested a review from quintesse July 8, 2024 23:59
@gastaldi gastaldi changed the title Introduce putAll(Properties) Introduce putAll(Properties) Jul 8, 2024
@quintesse quintesse merged commit 2fd8468 into codejive:main Jul 9, 2024
1 check passed
@gastaldi gastaldi deleted the put_all branch July 9, 2024 00:27
@quintesse
Copy link
Collaborator

Great, thanks man. Appreciate the work :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants