You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It appears that we overlooked the fact that structures can consist of multiple fragments. When this occurs, both atoms and unsaturations are included within the mfInfo.parts property as an array that contains the corresponding information for each fragment.
Given that atoms are stored as text data, I created a workaround by converting an array of atoms (e.g., [{atoms1},{atoms2}]) into a string. However, the issue with unsaturations, which are stored as integers, presents a more significant challenge. Currently, the highest value of all fragments is being used (as of 20.03.23), but this is not a permanent solution.
We need to find a more comprehensive solution that addresses the unsaturation problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Finally we will add the sum. A new version of mass-tools will be released to calculate the sum in case there are any parts: cheminfo/mass-tools@b96a6d6
It appears that we overlooked the fact that structures can consist of multiple fragments. When this occurs, both atoms and unsaturations are included within the mfInfo.parts property as an array that contains the corresponding information for each fragment.
Given that atoms are stored as text data, I created a workaround by converting an array of atoms (e.g., [{atoms1},{atoms2}]) into a string. However, the issue with unsaturations, which are stored as integers, presents a more significant challenge. Currently, the highest value of all fragments is being used (as of 20.03.23), but this is not a permanent solution.
We need to find a more comprehensive solution that addresses the unsaturation problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: