Edit

_includes/head.html

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 
    <!--  <link href="/css/fontawesome/css/all.css" rel="stylesheet">-->
    <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/typed.js@2.0.12"></script>
-   <link rel="stylesheet" media="screen" href="https://fontlibrary.org//face/linux-biolinum" type="text/css"/>
+<!--   <link rel="stylesheet" media="screen" href="https://fontlibrary.org//face/linux-biolinum" type="text/css"/>-->
    <link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com">
    <link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin>
    <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Rouge+Script&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">

_posts/2023/2023-11-12-how-i-peer-review-research-papers.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 layout: post
 title: How I Peer Review Research Papers
-subtitle: My reviewer flow, template, and tips
+subtitle: My reviewer flow, focused template, and personal tips
 tags: science
 description: |
   In this blog post, I share my experiences and personal approach when peer-reviewing research papers in the field of software engineering. My focus is on delivering good peer reviews, fast and effectively. I give my template and provide generalizable examples of good and bad reviews. After reading this post, as a reviewer, you will gain first-hand insight on how to give constructive feedback to paper's authors so that they could improve the quality of their research papers.