fix: update ref handling in ListBoxMenuItem useIsTruncated hook

[adamalston]

Closes #18459

Updated ref handling in ListBoxMenuItem useIsTruncated hook.

Changelog

Changed

• Converted useIsTruncated to a generic hook with explicit HTMLElement typing.
• Improved forwarded ref handling by ensuring proper fallback to a local ref.
• Included dependencies in useIsTruncated to accurately detect truncation.

Testing / Reviewing

I'm not sure how to write a test for this functionality. I did take the code from #18459 and test it to ensure that titles were added to the appropriate items.

yarn test packages/react/src/components/ListBox

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for v11-carbon-web-components ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	dd403b6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/v11-carbon-web-components/deploys/67b7b4ca71e9640008b08aaa
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-18611--v11-carbon-web-components.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for carbon-elements ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	dd403b6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/carbon-elements/deploys/67b7b4cae5a1210008629772
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-18611--carbon-elements.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for v11-carbon-react ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	dd403b6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/v11-carbon-react/deploys/67b7b4caf076bc0008200a7f
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-18611--v11-carbon-react.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.96%. Comparing base (9d0c15e) to head (dd403b6).
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s/react/src/components/ListBox/ListBoxMenuItem.tsx	88.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18611      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.98%   84.96%   +0.98%     
==========================================
  Files         408      408              
  Lines       14501    14556      +55     
  Branches     4729     4769      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits        12178    12368     +190     
+ Misses       2155     2026     -129     
+ Partials      168      162       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tay1orjones]

Should useIsTruncated house the ref inspection? I'm anticipating it's soon going to be moved out of this file to be something we can import into various other components that need it.

[tay1orjones]

At first glance I thought this was an issue because changing the value of the ref won't trigger a re-render, but turns out that's not the case. TIL!

[tay1orjones]

Would it make sense to test this with a mocked callback ref function?

carbon/packages/icon-build-helpers/src/builders/react/components/__tests__/Icon-test.js

Lines 40 to 47 in 7b9a05b

	it('should forward refs to the rendered SVG DOM element', () => {
	let svg;
	const ref = jest.fn((node) => {
	svg = node;
	});
	const { container } = render(<Icon ref={ref} />);
	expect(svg).toEqual(container.querySelector('svg'));
	});

[adamalston]

Should useIsTruncated house the ref inspection? I'm anticipating it's soon going to be moved out of this file to be something we can import into various other components that need it.

Let me know if what's in dd403b6 is better or worse. I tried to make it more composable comprehensive but I'm not sure if I hit the mark.