You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When addressing the inconsistencies in 4-letter codes between ML and PC datasets, I noticed that the following birds in the PC dataset do not have corresponding entries in birds.txt (which I assume is an index of all the birds in the ML output/species the model is trained on):
Both are rare on the landscape but have been detected in point count surveys. Not a huge deal, but just wanted to document the observation here so that we avoid confusion/frustration when interpreting occumodel output for those two species.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When addressing the inconsistencies in 4-letter codes between ML and PC datasets, I noticed that the following birds in the PC dataset do not have corresponding entries in birds.txt (which I assume is an index of all the birds in the ML output/species the model is trained on):
DOWO (Downy Woodpecker)
RWBL (Red-winged Blackbird)
Both are rare on the landscape but have been detected in point count surveys. Not a huge deal, but just wanted to document the observation here so that we avoid confusion/frustration when interpreting occumodel output for those two species.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: