You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One mistake I can see people making is to use species.mass instead of mass(species) and then wondering what went wrong. To help avoid this, I propose modifying the mass field of the Species struct. So instead of species.mass use the name species.mass_in_std_units (or any other name that is descriptive).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I renamed the struct field in the most recent PR for branch '75+-edit_species_mass_unit', but I haven't renamed the same field in either the atomic or subatomic species dictionaries. Should I?
One mistake I can see people making is to use
species.mass
instead ofmass(species)
and then wondering what went wrong. To help avoid this, I propose modifying themass
field of the Species struct. So instead ofspecies.mass
use the namespecies.mass_in_std_units
(or any other name that is descriptive).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: