fixed the status boxes on screen to be more responsive and better align with UI #1985
Conversation
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: Improve responsiveness and visual alignment of status boxes across different screen sizes
- Key components modified: StatBox and StatusBoxes layout components
- Cross-component impacts: Affects all instances using StatusBoxes component
- Business value alignment: Enhances user experience through improved visual consistency and responsive design
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: Implemented responsive width calculations using theme breakpoints
- Component interaction changes: Modified flex container properties for better space distribution
- Integration points impact: Maintains existing prop interfaces for backward compatibility
- Dependency changes: No new dependencies introduced
2. Critical Findings
2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)
No critical must-fix issues identified
2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)
Issue: Magic number in responsive width calculation
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Impact: Reduces code maintainability and makes future adjustments difficult
- Suggested Solution: Extract 95% value to named constant with explanation
Issue: Ambiguous width/minWidth combination
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Impact: Potential layout inconsistencies and code clarity issues
- Suggested Solution: Clarify purpose of minWidth through comments
2.3 Consider (P2🟢)
Area: Redundant display property
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Improvement Opportunity: Code simplification by removing unnecessary flex declaration
Area: Issue linking
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Improvement Opportunity: Better traceability by linking to original issue
2.4 Summary of Action Items
- Address magic number and width clarification (P1 - immediate)
- Remove redundant display property (P2 - before merge)
- Add issue reference (P2 - optional)
3. Technical Analysis
3.1 Code Logic Analysis
📁 src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx - StatBox component
- Submitted PR Code:
const responsiveWidths = {
default: "calc(95% / 4)",
xl: "calc(95% / 3)",
md: "calc(95% / 2)",
};
// In Stack component sx prop:
minWidth: 200,
width: responsiveWidths.default,
[theme.breakpoints.down("xl")]: {
width: responsiveWidths.xl,
},
[theme.breakpoints.down("md")]: {
width: responsiveWidths.md,
},- Analysis:
- Current logic uses magic number 95% without clear explanation
- Combined minWidth/width usage needs documentation
- Breakpoint values hardcoded but aligned with Material-UI standards
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const containerWidthPercentage = 95; // Accounts for parent container padding
const responsiveWidths = {
default: `calc(${containerWidthPercentage}% / 4)`,
xl: `calc(${containerWidthPercentage}% / 3)`,
md: `calc(${containerWidthPercentage}% / 2)`,
};
// In Stack styles:
minWidth: 200, // Ensures readability on small screens
width: responsiveWidths.default,- Improvement rationale:
- Explicit percentage constant improves maintainability
- Clear comment explains minWidth purpose
📁 src/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx - StatusBoxes component
- Submitted PR Code:
<Stack
direction="row"
flexWrap={flexWrap}
gap={theme.spacing(8)}
justifyContent="space-between"
display="flex"
>- Analysis:
- display="flex" is redundant with Stack component behavior
- justifyContent improves layout distribution
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<Stack
direction="row"
flexWrap={flexWrap}
gap={theme.spacing(8)}
justifyContent="space-between"
>- Improvement rationale:
- Removes redundant property
- Maintains identical layout behavior
3.2 Key Quality Aspects
- Testing strategy: Recommend adding visual regression tests for responsive layouts
- Documentation needs: Update component style guide with new responsive behavior
4. Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: Well-structured responsive implementation using theme conventions
- Business impact: Direct UX improvement for monitoring visualization
- Risk evaluation: Low risk with proper testing verification
- Notable positive aspects: Excellent use of theme spacing/breakpoints, clear before/after visuals
- Implementation quality: Good overall with minor maintainability improvements needed
- Final recommendation: Approve with suggested P1 improvements addressed
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
WalkthroughThis pull request updates two components. The StatBox component now applies dynamic width values by introducing a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx (1)
23-24: The justifyContent property is solid, but display="flex" seems redundantYo, the
justifyContent="space-between"is a great addition to fix that alignment issue! It'll distribute those status boxes evenly across the container. However, Material-UI's Stack component already uses display: flex by default, so addingdisplay="flex"is like putting an extra sweater on when you're already wearing one - unnecessary, ya know?<Stack direction="row" flexWrap={flexWrap} gap={theme.spacing(8)} justifyContent="space-between" - display="flex" >src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx (1)
95-102: Responsive implementation looks good, but we could leverage theme breakpoints betterThis responsive implementation is a major improvement over the previous fixed width approach! Now the status boxes will properly adapt to different screen sizes with 4, 3, or 2 items per row depending on viewport width.
One small suggestion - since you're already using the theme breakpoints system, you could potentially refactor this to use the theme's spacing or grid system for even more consistency:
// this is for status box to be reponsive on diff screens -width: responsiveWidths.default, // Default: 4 items per row -[theme.breakpoints.down("xl")]: { - width: responsiveWidths.xl, // 3 items per row -}, -[theme.breakpoints.down("md")]: { - width: responsiveWidths.md, // 2 items per row -}, +width: `calc(${theme.spacing(95)} / 4)`, // Default: 4 items per row +[theme.breakpoints.down("xl")]: { + width: `calc(${theme.spacing(95)} / 3)`, // 3 items per row +}, +[theme.breakpoints.down("md")]: { + width: `calc(${theme.spacing(95)} / 2)`, // 2 items per row +},Also, there's still that TODO comment on line 93 about using both width and minWidth. That situation hasn't changed and might be worth addressing in a future update.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx(3 hunks)src/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx (5)
src/Components/StatusBoxes/index.jsx (1) (1)
theme(8-8)src/Components/Charts/CustomGauge/index.jsx (1) (1)
theme(31-31)src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/Components/GaugeBoxes/Gauge.jsx (1) (1)
theme(10-10)src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (1) (1)
theme(31-31)src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/Hooks/useHardwareUtils.jsx (1) (1)
theme(12-12)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Components/StatBox/index.jsx (2)
82-86: The responsive width approach looks great!The introduction of this
responsiveWidthsobject is a smart move for organizing your breakpoint calculations. It makes the code easier to maintain since all width values are defined in one place. This will definitely help with making the UI more organized as mentioned in the PR objectives.
136-136: Typography styling looks goodThe addition of fontWeight styling to the Typography component for the subHeading improves the visual hierarchy. Nice touch!
|
@gorkem-bwl can you weigh in on which design you prefer here? I'm not qualified to make a judemgent 😂 |
| const responsiveWidths = { | ||
| default: "calc(95% / 4)", | ||
| xl: "calc(95% / 3)", | ||
| md: "calc(95% / 2)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is 95% the value to use here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Owaiseimdad your thoughts on the 95%?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ajhollid the reason for 95% is because, is to the other 5% to the outer part of the card. 94 was very small and 96 made it scatter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thats the only reason
or else we have to minus it with some px then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we good with this @ajhollid ?
Describe your changes
The design of status boxes where pretty out of order and due to this the UI looked a bit off, added necessary css in order better align with needs
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.
<div>Add</div>, use):Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e09fd92e-3939-4c74-863b-b90bd098fd36
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/073378ba-576b-4e7c-8c62-ba09312e5676