Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not working on new Arduino.. #48

Open
Curnelius opened this issue Jun 2, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Not working on new Arduino.. #48

Curnelius opened this issue Jun 2, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@Curnelius
Copy link

On the new boards using ARM processors, like the Zero, which are the future of MCU's, you get an error on compilation :

fatal error: avr/io.h: No such file or directory
#include "avr/io.h"

Wonder if its possible at all ?

@creationix
Copy link

Back when I looked at porting bitlash to the esp8266 I found that it makes a lot of assumptions about avr and arduino. It's a very simple language, it might make sense to re-implement it for other platforms. If we're going to do that then it might be time to re-evaluate the language decisions in light of the more powerful 32-bit processors.

This is an area in which I'm doing active research and would love to collaborate with someone.

@Curnelius
Copy link
Author

Thats right. I would like to read more about the design patterns required to write it again like a "pro", do you have something in mined ?

@q2dg
Copy link

q2dg commented Jul 25, 2016

Oooh, I would be really great if there was an platform-agnostic Bitlash. Really really great.
On the other hand, last commit in this github was more than two years ago...so maybe it's time to reboot.

@creationix
Copy link

@q2dg what exactly about bitlash (as compared to JS, lua, ruby, python, forth, lisp) do you like? Is is just the idea of scripting on a microcontroller in general or do you like the specific design of bitlash?

@q2dg
Copy link

q2dg commented Jul 25, 2016

The idea of real-time interaction with the microcontroller as if I was in a telnet session (with the possibility of creating own scripts to run on it, yes) . Thanks.

@creationix
Copy link

@billroy Would you be opposed to a new language being implemented that borrows heavily from the design of bitlash?

@billroy
Copy link
Owner

billroy commented Jul 25, 2016

Quite the contrary - I would encourage forks and forward experimentation in new directions!

-br

On Jul 25, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Tim Caswell notifications@github.com wrote:

@billroy https://github.com/billroy Would you be opposed to a new language being implemented that borrows heavily from the design of bitlash?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #48 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF-xp9FBfIZ6FMNwnBbTuSI7oGCIo3Vks5qZNvfgaJpZM4Ism3l.

@q2dg
Copy link

q2dg commented Jul 25, 2016

I haven't the technical skill to opinate about it. I'd only want front-end syntax were similar to Arduino's one.

@creationix
Copy link

Arduino is just C++ within a framework/library. It's not the easiest syntax to parse, but it's certainly the most popular style (JavaScript/Java/C/C++/C#/PHP/etc are all C-like syntax)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants