where was born #1
Comments
|
Scanning the Table we observe the 16 points of X fall into 10 orbits total, divided into 4 orbits of 1 point each and 6 orbits of 2 points each. The points in singleton orbits are called fixed points of the transformation group since they are not moved but mapped into themselves by all group actions. The bottom row of the Table tabulates the total number of fixed points for the group operations 1 and t respectively. The group identity 1 always fixes all points, so its total is 16. The group action t fixes only the four points in singleton orbits, giving a total of 4 f_7 => f_1 !(a && b) => (!a || !b) f_2 => f_11 (!x && y) => (x=>y) REF: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/02/28/animated-logical-graphs-62/ |
|
A sign relation L = O x S x I, as a set L embedded in a cartesian product O x S x I, tells how the signs in S and the interpretant signs in I correlate with the objects or objective situations in O. The 256 concepts are the object O (the word of 8 bit), the way in which express these concepts with 3 variables and different operators are the Sign REF: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/03/09/animated-logical-graphs-66/ |
|
Points in singleton orbits are called fixed points of the transformation group T : X \to X since they are left unchanged, or changed into themselves, by all group actions. Viewed in the frame of the sign relation L \subseteq O \times X \times X, where the transformations in T are literally translations in the linguistic sense, these T-invariant graphs have the same denotations in O for both Existential Interpreters and Entitative Interpreters. tThey are not translations but concepts included in other concepts. a-> b = aCb. The truth of b is much broader but if a is true then b is also true REF: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/04/22/animated-logical-graphs-72/ |
ref: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/02/26/animated-logical-graphs-61/ |
|
https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2020-06/thrd5.html#00092 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/26/animated-logical-graphs-81/ Fouth note a Pierce-list. I didn't know. It was a coincidence. There was no malice. |
I'm not sure if I understood but ((a&b=a) - >(a->b)) where & is a bitwise operator
Ref:https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/26/animated-logical-graphs-81/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: