-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #3 from berkkirtay/berkkirtay-patch-1
Update README.md
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
25 additions
and
21 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,38 +1,42 @@ | ||
# group-messaging-in-go | ||
I have been developing this program to utilize a messaging interface for my own local networks. I used P2P approach on top of HTTP. This lets us treat this program as both a peer and a centralized server. How we use it merely depends on the use case. It is possible to use a CLI interface to send a message, as well as to use an HTTP tool such as cURL. It must be noted that clients are responsible to encrypt their own data in P2P programs and that is what I did in this implementation. Surely we can use HTTPS instead of HTTP. This is a must if this program is to be used in a production environment. I plan to add this along with Diffie-hellman key exchange between peers. | ||
I have been developing this program to utilize a messaging interface for my own local networks. I used P2P approach on top of HTTP. This lets us treat this program as both a peer and a centralized server. How we use it merely depends on the use case. It is possible to use a CLI interface to send a message, as well as to use an HTTP tool such as cURL. It must be noted that clients are responsible to encrypt their own data as well as agreeing on key exchange algorithms in P2P programs and that is what I did in this implementation. | ||
|
||
Right now this is only a fun side project. Please contact me for any consideration and improvement point. As I mentioned earlier, I will continue developing this project as long as I have time. | ||
|
||
## Simple flow of the program | ||
1. A requestor peer passes a public key and a signature to serving peer. | ||
|
||
2. The serving peer validates the signature with the public key of the requestor peer by RSA algorithm and initializes a new session and authentication key for the peer. Then both peers agree on a new key by using ECDH and the serving peer passes the encrypted authentication key to the requestor. | ||
|
||
4. In every new request, peers agree on a new key by using newly generated public keys and use this key to encrypt the generated authentication key. | ||
|
||
5. Key agreement in every transaction can be done both RSA and ECDH algorithms. In RSA however, serving peer decides the key and passes to the requestor. | ||
|
||
6. The requestor peer can now send room and message requests. And can use the exchanged key to encrypt the messages. | ||
|
||
7. Every room can have a master key to encrypt the messages and this key can be distributed to the member peers of the room securely. | ||
|
||
8. Master peer can choose the renew the room master key and it can send a synchronization requests to the all users in a room. This would be easier to handle with WebSocket protocols (Not done yet). | ||
|
||
## Features | ||
- [x] P2P local node lookup using UDP Multicast | ||
- [x] HMAC based user authentication | ||
- [x] ECDH based user and peer authentication | ||
- [x] Chat room authorization | ||
- [x] HTTP based async messagging with DB synchronization among peers (requires improvement) | ||
- [ ] Diffie-hellman key exchange for p2p key agreement (requires improvement) | ||
- [x] CBC AES encryption for messages | ||
- [x] RSA or Elliptic-curve based digital signature for verifications | ||
- [ ] GUI usage instead of CLI | ||
- [x] CBC AES encryption for messages with the ECDH exchanged keys | ||
- [x] RSA based digital signature usage for verifications | ||
- [x] HTTP based async messagging between peers by polling. | ||
- [ ] Websocket based async messaging between peers. | ||
- [ ] Votalite memory usage for data. | ||
|
||
## Stack | ||
- Go | ||
- Go Gin framework | ||
- PKCS libraries | ||
- MongoDB | ||
|
||
## Usage | ||
|
||
## Considerations | ||
- HTTP based room messaging can be replaced by a custom protocol such that peers can communicate over a small layer on top of TCP directly. | ||
- For production usage, as centralized lookup server can be developed for peers to connect each other over the web. | ||
- Old-school password based authentication requires an additional layer of encryption. To improve this point, authentication must be done with user signatures where peers validate each others signatures and hashes. This means every user should generate their own private keys and use them for communication with other peers. | ||
In this flow: | ||
|
||
1. A user passes a public key and a signature to a peer. | ||
|
||
2. The peer can validate the signature with the public key and generate a authentication token for the user. To pass this token, the peer can encrypt it with the users public key. | ||
|
||
3. The user can decrypt the encrypted authentication key with his private key and start sending requests to the peer. | ||
|
||
4. The user can send room and message requests and the peer encrypt the room secret keys to the user which is similar to the authentication key encryption. | ||
|
||
5. The user can decrypt the room secret key (symmetric key) and use this key to encrypt and decrypt the messages in the room. | ||
|
||
6. Master peer can choose the renew the room master key and it can send a synchronization requests to the all users in a room. This would be easier to handle with UDP or WebSocket protocols. | ||
- Peers agree on a new exchanged key in every new transaction. But this key is only used for encrypting text/data field in the transmissions. The whole transmitted data can be encrypted as well. |